AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
AI visibilityConsultingSearch free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Oct 25, 2026 · Latest decision Oct 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesIskenderian v. Southeastern
Evidence review: metadata only. The linked page is generic, shared, or insufficiently case-specific. This page therefore preserves only the structured corpus baseline.
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

Iskenderian v. Southeastern

Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0); document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.

Hawai'i · Jun 23, 2025

/ stateEditorial impact: lowtrialNone Adjudicated
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Outcome: N/A. After other side pointed out that all authorities cited were fictitious, Counsel admitted it in brief. The court seemingly did not react.

Why the court cared
The linked record identifies trial and records N/A. This page does not infer judicial reasoning beyond the source.
Why it matters now
Courts may let a confession slide this time, but opposing counsel will preserve the admission for future Rule 11 motions.

Why this matter is tracked

Outcome: N/A. After other side pointed out that all authorities cited were fictitious, Counsel admitted it in brief. The court seemingly did not react.

Operational lesson

Courts may let a confession slide this time, but opposing counsel will preserve the admission for future Rule 11 motions.

Record details

CourtHawai'i
Jurisdictionstate
CircuitNot recorded
DateJun 23, 2025
UN
AI toolUnidentified
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeN/A
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

N/A

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Iskenderian v. Southeastern?
Outcome: N/A. After other side pointed out that all authorities cited were fictitious, Counsel admitted it in brief. The court seemingly did not react.
Why does Iskenderian v. Southeastern matter for legal AI risk?
Courts may let a confession slide this time, but opposing counsel will preserve the admission for future Rule 11 motions.
What does the public record establish about Iskenderian v. Southeastern?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Iskenderian v. Southeastern summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Omkara Assets Reconstruction Private Limited v. Gstaad Hotels Private LimitedSupreme Court · Oct 15, 2026trial · same recorded tool: UnidentifiedGlenn v. Absolute Resolutions Investments, LLC, et al.M.D. Florida · Oct 9, 2026trial · same recorded tool: UnidentifiedAvargil et al. v. Yaakov et al.MC Nof HaGalil-Nazareth · Oct 8, 2026trial · same recorded tool: UnidentifiedDuckett v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin SystemW.D. Wisconsin · Oct 7, 2026trial · same recorded tool: UnidentifiedShannon v. ShannonSC Nebraska · Oct 2, 2026trial · same recorded tool: UnidentifiedZheng Liu v. Lynk Global, Inc.Delaware CC · Sep 30, 2026trial · same recorded tool: Unidentified

This record mentions Rule 11. See Rule 11 sanctions for AI-generated citations for the rule text and counts across the corpus.

Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.