Which source supports this Khoury et al v. Intermountain Health Care Inc. et al summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

HomeCasesKhoury et al v. Intermountain Health Care Inc. et al

Evidence review: primary document limited. The primary document was retrieved, but one or more case-level facts could not be tied to a page-located passage. The structured corpus baseline is preserved without upgrading those claims.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 91/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.

Corpus matter record

Khoury et al v. Intermountain Health Care Inc. et al

D. Utah · Sep 30, 2025

UT / federal Editorial impact: low fake citations administrative trial Case Dismissed

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions Outcome: Case dismissed. Case dismissed for "good cause" in light of motions to dismiss expert. Expert had confessed using ChatGPT.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Case dismissed; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: Experts using ChatGPT can sink the whole case — require written AI-disclosure from every expert before retention.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions Outcome: Case dismissed. Case dismissed for "good cause" in light of motions to dismiss expert. Expert had confessed using ChatGPT.

Operational lesson

Experts using ChatGPT can sink the whole case — require written AI-disclosure from every expert before retention.

Record details

UtahSingle-state evidence scope

Explore UTOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.

CourtD. Utah

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit10th Circuit

DateSep 30, 2025

AI toolChatGPT

Party typeExpert

OutcomeCase dismissed

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

ChatGPT is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Case dismissed

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions
Fabricated: Case Law

Questions this record answers

What happened in Khoury et al v. Intermountain Health Care Inc. et al?: Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions Outcome: Case dismissed. Case dismissed for "good cause" in light of motions to dismiss expert. Expert had confessed using ChatGPT.
Why does Khoury et al v. Intermountain Health Care Inc. et al matter for legal AI risk?: Experts using ChatGPT can sink the whole case — require written AI-disclosure from every expert before retention.
What does the public record establish about Khoury et al v. Intermountain Health Care Inc. et al?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Khoury et al v. Intermountain Health Care Inc. et al summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Regan Wilkes, et al. v. Canyons School District, et al.D. Utah · May 4, 2026same court · fake citations + administrative Carey v. Breakell et al.D. Utah · Jul 30, 2026same court · fake citations + trial Hagan v. Black Diamond Experts, LLCD. Utah · Jul 23, 2026same court · fake citations + trial Primerica Life Insurance Company v. Daniel Vett Finlayson; Michelle JohnsonD. Utah · Apr 22, 2026same court · fake citations + trial Nicholas and Barbara Moulder v. Davis School District (on behalf of M.M.)D. Utah · Mar 23, 2026same court · fake citations + trial Black Oak Capital BOCA, LLC v. Paul Evans, LLC, et al.D. Utah · Dec 4, 2025same court · fake citations + trial

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source Suggest a correction to this record

Public-record statuspublic record, not an allegation-only entry

Indexing eligibilitypublicly indexable with evidence status disclosed

Evidence-review statusprimary document limited

Published and maintained byManu Ayala · AI VortexIndependent legal AI risk intelligence

Evidence review recorded Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Sep 10, 2026; latest tracked decision Sep 8, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Open D. Utah profile Explore jurisdiction

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology