HomeCasesKhoury et al v. Intermountain Health Care Inc. et al

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 91/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Khoury et al v. Intermountain Health Care Inc. et al

D. Utah · Sep 30, 2025

UT / federalEditorial impact: lowfake citationsadministrativetrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions Outcome: Case dismissed. Case dismissed for "good cause" in light of motions to dismiss expert. Expert had confessed using ChatGPT.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Case dismissed; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: Experts using ChatGPT can sink the whole case — require written AI-disclosure from every expert before retention.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions Outcome: Case dismissed. Case dismissed for "good cause" in light of motions to dismiss expert. Expert had confessed using ChatGPT.

Operational lesson

Experts using ChatGPT can sink the whole case — require written AI-disclosure from every expert before retention.

Record details

UtahSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtD. Utah

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit10th Circuit

DateSep 30, 2025

AI toolChatGPT

Party typeExpert

OutcomeCase dismissed

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

ChatGPT is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Case dismissed

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions
Fabricated: Case Law

Questions this record answers

What happened in Khoury et al v. Intermountain Health Care Inc. et al?: Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions Outcome: Case dismissed. Case dismissed for "good cause" in light of motions to dismiss expert. Expert had confessed using ChatGPT.
Why does Khoury et al v. Intermountain Health Care Inc. et al matter for legal AI risk?: Experts using ChatGPT can sink the whole case — require written AI-disclosure from every expert before retention.
What does the public record establish about Khoury et al v. Intermountain Health Care Inc. et al?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Khoury et al v. Intermountain Health Care Inc. et al summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Regan Wilkes, et al. v. Canyons School District, et al.D. Utah · May 4, 2026same court · fake citations + administrative Primerica Life Insurance Company v. Daniel Vett Finlayson; Michelle JohnsonD. Utah · Apr 22, 2026same court · fake citations + trial Nicholas and Barbara Moulder v. Davis School District (on behalf of M.M.)D. Utah · Mar 23, 2026same court · fake citations + trial Black Oak Capital BOCA, LLC v. Paul Evans, LLC, et al.D. Utah · Dec 4, 2025same court · fake citations + trial Ryan Lee v. Capital One Bank et al.D. Utah · Feb 24, 2026same court · trial Ross Logan v. LVNV Funding et al.D. Utah · Nov 5, 2025same court · trial

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Questions this record answers

What happened in Khoury et al v. Intermountain Health Care Inc. et al?

Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions Outcome: Case dismissed. Case dismissed for "good cause" in light of motions to dismiss expert. Expert had confessed using ChatGPT.

Why does Khoury et al v. Intermountain Health Care Inc. et al matter for legal AI risk?

Experts using ChatGPT can sink the whole case — require written AI-disclosure from every expert before retention.

What does the public record establish about Khoury et al v. Intermountain Health Care Inc. et al?

Which source supports this Khoury et al v. Intermountain Health Care Inc. et al summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.