Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 76/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Landberg v City of New York
App. NY (2d) · May 20, 2026
NY / stateEditorial impact: mediumtorttrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
The New York appellate court issued an order to show cause directing the parties to address whether sanctions or costs should be imposed in connection with briefs that included fabricated and/or erroneous legal authority or citations.
- Why the court cared
- The linked record identifies tort and trial and records Order to Show Cause. This page does not infer judicial reasoning beyond the source.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects tort and trial involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Order to Show Cause in App. NY (2d), making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
The New York appellate court issued an order to show cause directing the parties to address whether sanctions or costs should be imposed in connection with briefs that included fabricated and/or erroneous legal authority or citations.
Operational lesson
This matter connects tort and trial involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Order to Show Cause in App. NY (2d), making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
New YorkSingle-state evidence scope
CourtApp. NY (2d)
Jurisdictionstate
Circuit2nd Circuit
DateMay 20, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeOrder to Show Cause
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Order to Show Cause
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Landberg v City of New York?
- The New York appellate court issued an order to show cause directing the parties to address whether sanctions or costs should be imposed in connection with briefs that included fabricated and/or erroneous legal authority or citations.
- Why does Landberg v City of New York matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects tort and trial involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Order to Show Cause in App. NY (2d), making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Landberg v City of New York?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Landberg v City of New York summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.