HomeCasesLionel Rayale Maurice v. Warden Barry Wingfield

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 76/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Lionel Rayale Maurice v. Warden Barry Wingfield

S.D. Mississippi · Jun 9, 2025

MS / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationshabeastrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Petitioner cited "Gonzalez v. United States, 959 F. Supp. 2d 728 (W.D. Tex. 2013)", which the court determined does not exist and thus is a fabricated case citation.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is the response recorded in the linked source; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with a recorded judicial response in S.D. Mississippi, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Petitioner cited "Gonzalez v. United States, 959 F. Supp. 2d 728 (W.D. Tex. 2013)", which the court determined does not exist and thus is a fabricated case citation.

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with a recorded judicial response in S.D. Mississippi, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

MississippiSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtS.D. Mississippi

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit5th Circuit

DateJun 9, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeSee source

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Petitioner cited "Gonzalez v. United States, 959 F. Supp. 2d 728 (W.D. Tex. 2013)", which the court determined does not exist and thus is a fabricated case citation.
Fabricated: Case Law | Petitioner cited "Garza v. Davis, 596 F. App'x 319 (5th Cir. 2015)", but the court found the citation did not correspond to that authority; the provided citation actually referred to Torres v. Krueger (a bankruptcy case) and the cited Garza does not exist as presented.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Lionel Rayale Maurice v. Warden Barry Wingfield?: Fabricated: Case Law | Petitioner cited "Gonzalez v. United States, 959 F. Supp. 2d 728 (W.D. Tex. 2013)", which the court determined does not exist and thus is a fabricated case citation.
Why does Lionel Rayale Maurice v. Warden Barry Wingfield matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with a recorded judicial response in S.D. Mississippi, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Lionel Rayale Maurice v. Warden Barry Wingfield?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Lionel Rayale Maurice v. Warden Barry Wingfield summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Yuri Petrini v. City of Biloxi, Mississippi, et al.S.D. Mississippi · Jun 30, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Latasha Hill v. Auto Club Family Insurance CompanyS.D. Mississippi · Sep 17, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Malone-Bey v. Lauderdale County School BoardS.D. Mississippi · Jul 25, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Pauliah v. University of Mississippi Medical CenterS.D. Mississippi · Dec 30, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations University Mall v. Okorie et al.S.D. Mississippi · Oct 22, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Johnny Fuselier v. John S. RiscassiS.D. Mississippi · May 1, 2026same court · fake citations + trial

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Petitioner cited "Gonzalez v. United States, 959 F. Supp. 2d 728 (W.D. Tex. 2013)", which the court determined does not exist and thus is a fabricated case citation.

Operational lesson

Record details

MississippiSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtS.D. Mississippi

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit5th Circuit

DateJun 9, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeSee source

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Petitioner cited "Gonzalez v. United States, 959 F. Supp. 2d 728 (W.D. Tex. 2013)", which the court determined does not exist and thus is a fabricated case citation.

Fabricated: Case Law | Petitioner cited "Garza v. Davis, 596 F. App'x 319 (5th Cir. 2015)", but the court found the citation did not correspond to that authority; the provided citation actually referred to Torres v. Krueger (a bankruptcy case) and the cited Garza does not exist as presented.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Lionel Rayale Maurice v. Warden Barry Wingfield?

Fabricated: Case Law | Petitioner cited "Gonzalez v. United States, 959 F. Supp. 2d 728 (W.D. Tex. 2013)", which the court determined does not exist and thus is a fabricated case citation.

Why does Lionel Rayale Maurice v. Warden Barry Wingfield matter for legal AI risk?

What does the public record establish about Lionel Rayale Maurice v. Warden Barry Wingfield?

Which source supports this Lionel Rayale Maurice v. Warden Barry Wingfield summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.