AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
Search free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Nov 13, 2026 · Latest decision Nov 8, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesMapp v Vasyukevich
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 76/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

Mapp v Vasyukevich

Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0); document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.

Cite this record

SC New York · Nov 2, 2026

NY / stateEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationstorttrialNone Adjudicated
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | The plaintiff cited a nonexistent case as authority; the Court checked the Official Reports and found no decision at the cited location.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records a recorded judicial or procedural response. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with a recorded judicial or procedural response in SC New York. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | The plaintiff cited a nonexistent case as authority; the Court checked the Official Reports and found no decision at the cited location.

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations with a recorded judicial or procedural response in SC New York. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

New YorkSingle-state evidence scope
Explore NYOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.
CourtSC New York
Jurisdictionstate
Circuit2nd Circuit
DateNov 2, 2026
First seenNov 13, 2026 (in this dataset)
AI toolNo tool named in source
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeSee source
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | The plaintiff cited a nonexistent case as authority; the Court checked the Official Reports and found no decision at the cited location.
  2. Fabricated: Case Law | The plaintiff cited a nonexistent case; the Court found no decision bearing that case name at the cited location in the Official Reports.
  3. Fabricated: Case Law | The plaintiff cited a nonexistent case; the Court found no decision bearing that case name at the cited location in the Official Reports.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Mapp v Vasyukevich?
Fabricated: Case Law | The plaintiff cited a nonexistent case as authority; the Court checked the Official Reports and found no decision at the cited location.
Why does Mapp v Vasyukevich matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with a recorded judicial or procedural response in SC New York. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Mapp v Vasyukevich?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Mapp v Vasyukevich summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Gully v VargheseSC New York · May 12, 2026same court · pro se + fake citationsKeefe v. BMakin Film LtdSC New York · Apr 24, 2026same court · pro se + fake citationsRivera v. 292 Madison NY LLCSC New York · Oct 15, 2026same court · fake citations + tortRodriguez v. Time Warner EntertainmentSC New York · Jul 22, 2026same court · fake citations + tortVargas v. MTA Bus Co.SC New York · Jun 12, 2026same court · fake citations + tortBurnett v. The City of New YorkSC New York · Dec 31, 2025same court · fake citations + tort

This record involves a self-represented party. See all pro se litigant AI hallucination decisions in the corpus, with counts by year, country and outcome.

Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.