Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 91/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Mazurek et al. v. Thomazoni
Parana State · Apr 2, 2025
BrazilEditorial impact: highfake citationsfamilytrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Fabricated TJPR appeal decision; not found in Projudi; attributed to a retired judge who never sat on the 8th Chamber. Outcome: Referral to the bar; Monetary fine (1% of case value).
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Referral to the bar; Monetary fine (1% of case value); the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- ChatGPT-generated TJPR citations with retired judges are easily detected—verify relator chamber and tenure before filing.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Fabricated TJPR appeal decision; not found in Projudi; attributed to a retired judge who never sat on the 8th Chamber. Outcome: Referral to the bar; Monetary fine (1% of case value).
Operational lesson
ChatGPT-generated TJPR citations with retired judges are easily detected—verify relator chamber and tenure before filing.
Record details
CourtParana State
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateApr 2, 2025
CH
AI toolChatGPT
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeReferral to the bar; Monetary fine (1% of case value)
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionYes
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
ChatGPT is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Referral to the bar; Monetary fine (1% of case value)
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Fabricated TJPR appeal decision; not found in Projudi; attributed to a retired judge who never sat on the 8th Chamber.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Fabricated TJPR agravo de instrumento; not found in Projudi; numbering pattern incompatible; attributed to a judge retired since 30/01/2023 but allegedly judged in 2024.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Fabricated TJPR appeal decision; not found in Projudi; relator indicado pertence à 11ª Câmara desde 2010, não à 7ª Câmara informada.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Mazurek et al. v. Thomazoni?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Fabricated TJPR appeal decision; not found in Projudi; attributed to a retired judge who never sat on the 8th Chamber. Outcome: Referral to the bar; Monetary fine (1% of case value).
- Why does Mazurek et al. v. Thomazoni matter for legal AI risk?
- ChatGPT-generated TJPR citations with retired judges are easily detected—verify relator chamber and tenure before filing.
- What does the public record establish about Mazurek et al. v. Thomazoni?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Mazurek et al. v. Thomazoni summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.