Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 86/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Vilmar Martins dos Santos v. State of Parana
Parana State · Apr 11, 2025
BrazilEditorial impact: lowfake citationsfabricated quotesmisrepresented authoritycriminal
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
False Quotes: Exhibits & Submissions | Defense attributed a phrase to the pronúncia that the court states does not exist in that decision. Outcome: Appeal dismissed; lawyers warned.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Appeal dismissed; lawyers warned; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- Defense counsel must cross-check relator names and process numbers—implausible patterns expose AI fabrication fast.
Why this matter is tracked
False Quotes: Exhibits & Submissions | Defense attributed a phrase to the pronúncia that the court states does not exist in that decision. Outcome: Appeal dismissed; lawyers warned.
Operational lesson
Defense counsel must cross-check relator names and process numbers—implausible patterns expose AI fabrication fast.
Record details
CourtParana State
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateApr 11, 2025
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeAppeal dismissed; lawyers warned
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Appeal dismissed; lawyers warned
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
13 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- False Quotes: Exhibits & Submissions | Defense attributed a phrase to the pronúncia that the court states does not exist in that decision.
- False Quotes: Exhibits & Submissions | Defense inserted a conclusion as if from the pronúncia; the court confirms the phrase is not present.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Fabricated TJPR decision using an implausible process number pattern; court says the jurisprudence is AI-created.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Fabricated TJPR decision naming a non-existent desembargador in the country.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Fabricated TJPR decision listing João Pedro Gebran Neto as TJPR relator; court notes he belongs to TRF-4, not TJPR.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Fabricated TJPR decision with a relator name the court says does not exist.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Fabricated TJPR appeal citing a non-existent desembargador as relator.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Misrepresented TJPR decision naming a judge who had retired long before the cited dates.
Show 5 additional discrepancies
- Fabricated: Case Law | Fabricated STF habeas corpus; court states none of the STF citations listed are genuine.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Fabricated STJ habeas corpus; court states none of the STJ citations listed are genuine.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Fabricated STJ interlocutory agravo in special appeal; court found STJ citations not authentic.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Fabricated STF agravo de instrumento; court indicated STF citations were not genuine.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Fabricated TJPR decision again using implausible numbering pattern and a non-existent relator.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Vilmar Martins dos Santos v. State of Parana?
- False Quotes: Exhibits & Submissions | Defense attributed a phrase to the pronúncia that the court states does not exist in that decision. Outcome: Appeal dismissed; lawyers warned.
- Why does Vilmar Martins dos Santos v. State of Parana matter for legal AI risk?
- Defense counsel must cross-check relator names and process numbers—implausible patterns expose AI fabrication fast.
- What does the public record establish about Vilmar Martins dos Santos v. State of Parana?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Vilmar Martins dos Santos v. State of Parana summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.