Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Mr J Harrison v Mr D May t/a Leeds Gymnastics Academy
Employment Tribunals (Leeds) · Dec 10, 2025
GBEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsemploymenttrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Respondent's written submissions contained numerous non-existent case law references; respondent admitted he used ChatGPT to generate the submissions and did not verify citations. Tribunal found at least half of the references were non-existent. Outcome: Tribunal awarded claimant a preparation time order of £2,178; payment stayed pending outcome of EAT appeal..
- Why the court cared
- Fabricated: Case Law | Respondent's written submissions contained numerous non-existent case law references; respondent admitted he used ChatGPT to generate the submissions and did not verify citations. Tribunal found at least half of the references were non-existent.
- Why it matters now
- This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in Employment Tribunals (Leeds), with the listed outcome: Tribunal awarded claimant a preparation time order of £2,178; payment stayed pending outcome of EAT appeal..
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Respondent's written submissions contained numerous non-existent case law references; respondent admitted he used ChatGPT to generate the submissions and did not verify citations. Tribunal found at least half of the references were non-existent. Outcome: Tribunal awarded claimant a preparation time order of £2,178; payment stayed pending outcome of EAT appeal..
Operational lesson
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in Employment Tribunals (Leeds), with the listed outcome: Tribunal awarded claimant a preparation time order of £2,178; payment stayed pending outcome of EAT appeal..
Record details
CourtEmployment Tribunals (Leeds)
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateDec 10, 2025
CH
AI toolChatGPT
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeTribunal awarded claimant a preparation time order of £2,178; payment stayed pending outcome of EAT appeal.
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
ChatGPT is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Tribunal awarded claimant a preparation time order of £2,178; payment stayed pending outcome of EAT appeal.
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Respondent's written submissions contained numerous non-existent case law references; respondent admitted he used ChatGPT to generate the submissions and did not verify citations. Tribunal found at least half of the references were non-existent.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Mr J Harrison v Mr D May t/a Leeds Gymnastics Academy?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Respondent's written submissions contained numerous non-existent case law references; respondent admitted he used ChatGPT to generate the submissions and did not verify citations. Tribunal found at least half of the references were non-existent. Outcome: Tribunal awarded claimant a preparation time order of £2,178; payment stayed pending outcome of EAT appeal..
- Why does Mr J Harrison v Mr D May t/a Leeds Gymnastics Academy matter for legal AI risk?
- This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in Employment Tribunals (Leeds), with the listed outcome: Tribunal awarded claimant a preparation time order of £2,178; payment stayed pending outcome of EAT appeal..
- What does the public record establish about Mr J Harrison v Mr D May t/a Leeds Gymnastics Academy?
- Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
- Which source supports this Mr J Harrison v Mr D May t/a Leeds Gymnastics Academy summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.