AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
AI visibilityConsultingSearch free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Aug 16, 2026 · Latest decision Aug 13, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesNº 1.0000.25.200097-1/001 (Antônio Carlos Vieira Barbosa)
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

Nº 1.0000.25.200097-1/001 (Antônio Carlos Vieira Barbosa)

TJ Minas Gerais · Nov 19, 2025

BrazilEditorial impact: highfake citationsbar referraltrialBar ReferralProfessional
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Defense cited judgments by process number that, upon consultation of tribunal sites, were found to be nonexistent; court flagged them as fabricated. Outcome: Bar Referral; Brief Partly Struck.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies fake citations and bar referral and records Bar Referral; Brief Partly Struck. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects fake citations and bar referral with Bar Referral; Brief Partly Struck in TJ Minas Gerais. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Defense cited judgments by process number that, upon consultation of tribunal sites, were found to be nonexistent; court flagged them as fabricated. Outcome: Bar Referral; Brief Partly Struck.

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and bar referral with Bar Referral; Brief Partly Struck in TJ Minas Gerais. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

CourtTJ Minas Gerais
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateNov 19, 2025
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeBar Referral; Brief Partly Struck
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionYes
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Bar Referral; Brief Partly Struck

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | Defense cited judgments by process number that, upon consultation of tribunal sites, were found to be nonexistent; court flagged them as fabricated.
  2. Fabricated: Doctrinal Work | Defense referenced supposed súmulas of the Superior Tribunal de Justiça whose enunciados were fictitious; court identified the súmulas as invented.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Nº 1.0000.25.200097-1/001 (Antônio Carlos Vieira Barbosa)?
Fabricated: Case Law | Defense cited judgments by process number that, upon consultation of tribunal sites, were found to be nonexistent; court flagged them as fabricated. Outcome: Bar Referral; Brief Partly Struck.
Why does Nº 1.0000.25.200097-1/001 (Antônio Carlos Vieira Barbosa) matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects fake citations and bar referral with Bar Referral; Brief Partly Struck in TJ Minas Gerais. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Nº 1.0000.25.200097-1/001 (Antônio Carlos Vieira Barbosa)?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Nº 1.0000.25.200097-1/001 (Antônio Carlos Vieira Barbosa) summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

FJL v TGOGauteng Division, Johannesburg · Jul 31, 2026fake citations + bar referral · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Recurso de Suplicación 0005472/2025T.S.X. Galicia · Jul 7, 2026fake citations + bar referral · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)LiveVideo.AI Corp. v. RedstoneS.D. New York · Jun 9, 2026fake citations + bar referral · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Reaves Law Firm, PLLC v. Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC, et al.W.D. Tennessee · Jun 2, 2026fake citations + bar referral · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)EML (a pseudonym) v AFT (a pseudonym) [2026] VCC 734County Court of Victoria · May 28, 2026fake citations + bar referral · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)In re the Marriage of Amy Haddock and Justin Blu HaddockDC Oklahoma · May 21, 2026fake citations + bar referral · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)