Nº 1.0000.25.200097-1/001 (Antônio Carlos Vieira Barbosa)
Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0); document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.
TJ Minas Gerais · Nov 19, 2025
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Defense cited judgments by process number that, upon consultation of tribunal sites, were found to be nonexistent; court flagged them as fabricated. Outcome: Bar Referral; Brief Partly Struck.
- Why the court cared
- The structured public record identifies fake citations and bar referral and records Bar Referral; Brief Partly Struck. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects fake citations and bar referral with Bar Referral; Brief Partly Struck in TJ Minas Gerais. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Defense cited judgments by process number that, upon consultation of tribunal sites, were found to be nonexistent; court flagged them as fabricated. Outcome: Bar Referral; Brief Partly Struck.
This matter connects fake citations and bar referral with Bar Referral; Brief Partly Struck in TJ Minas Gerais. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
What the record establishes about AI use
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
Bar Referral; Brief Partly Struck
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Defense cited judgments by process number that, upon consultation of tribunal sites, were found to be nonexistent; court flagged them as fabricated.
- Fabricated: Doctrinal Work | Defense referenced supposed súmulas of the Superior Tribunal de Justiça whose enunciados were fictitious; court identified the súmulas as invented.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Nº 1.0000.25.200097-1/001 (Antônio Carlos Vieira Barbosa)?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Defense cited judgments by process number that, upon consultation of tribunal sites, were found to be nonexistent; court flagged them as fabricated. Outcome: Bar Referral; Brief Partly Struck.
- Why does Nº 1.0000.25.200097-1/001 (Antônio Carlos Vieira Barbosa) matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects fake citations and bar referral with Bar Referral; Brief Partly Struck in TJ Minas Gerais. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Nº 1.0000.25.200097-1/001 (Antônio Carlos Vieira Barbosa)?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Nº 1.0000.25.200097-1/001 (Antônio Carlos Vieira Barbosa) summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases
One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.