Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
No. 25BX02906
CAA Bordeaux · Feb 26, 2026
FranceEditorial impact: lowfake citationsmisrepresented authorityadministrativetrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
In No. 25BX02906, the Bordeaux Administrative Court of Appeal rejected the appeal as manifestly unfounded and separately warned counsel to verify cited decisions before filing. The order found that several authorities were irrelevant to the dispute and that two cited decisions, including CE, 7 February 2018, No. 409302, did not exist; it cautioned against hallucinated or confabulated references.
- Why the court cared
- Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited 'CE, 7 février 2018, n° 409302'; the court states this decision does not exist. || Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited 'CE, 11 janvier 2007, Association SOS Racisme'; the court states this decision does not exist. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Counsel cited 'CE, 23 septembre 1987, Ministre du travail c/ Sté Ambulances 2000'; the court notes this decision concerns employment-training contract restrictions and is not relevant to the present matter (misapplied precedent). || Misrepresented: Case Law | Counsel cited 'CE, 14 novembre 2018, n° 420055'; the court states this decision concerns abusive requests to the administration and is not on point (misapplied precedent). || Misrepresented: Case Law | Counsel cited 'TC, 17 juin 2019, n° 4153'; the court observes this decision deals with jurisdictional competence regarding equality before public burdens and is not relevant to the appellant's claim (misapplied precedent). || Misrepresented: Case Law | Counsel cited 'CE, 25 août 2025, Commune de Massat'; the court notes this decision concerns freedom of worship in référé liberté and is not applicable to the case at hand (misapplied precedent).
- Why it matters now
- Misapplied precedent is as damaging as fabrication — read every cited case in full before relying on it.
Why this matter is tracked
In No. 25BX02906, the Bordeaux Administrative Court of Appeal rejected the appeal as manifestly unfounded and separately warned counsel to verify cited decisions before filing. The order found that several authorities were irrelevant to the dispute and that two cited decisions, including CE, 7 February 2018, No. 409302, did not exist; it cautioned against hallucinated or confabulated references.
Operational lesson
Misapplied precedent is as damaging as fabrication — read every cited case in full before relying on it.
Record details
CourtCAA Bordeaux
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateFeb 26, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeSee source
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
6 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited 'CE, 7 février 2018, n° 409302'; the court states this decision does not exist.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited 'CE, 11 janvier 2007, Association SOS Racisme'; the court states this decision does not exist.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Counsel cited 'CE, 23 septembre 1987, Ministre du travail c/ Sté Ambulances 2000'; the court notes this decision concerns employment-training contract restrictions and is not relevant to the present matter (misapplied precedent).
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Counsel cited 'CE, 14 novembre 2018, n° 420055'; the court states this decision concerns abusive requests to the administration and is not on point (misapplied precedent).
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Counsel cited 'TC, 17 juin 2019, n° 4153'; the court observes this decision deals with jurisdictional competence regarding equality before public burdens and is not relevant to the appellant's claim (misapplied precedent).
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Counsel cited 'CE, 25 août 2025, Commune de Massat'; the court notes this decision concerns freedom of worship in référé liberté and is not applicable to the case at hand (misapplied precedent).
Questions this record answers
- What happened in No. 25BX02906?
- In No. 25BX02906, the Bordeaux Administrative Court of Appeal rejected the appeal as manifestly unfounded and separately warned counsel to verify cited decisions before filing. The order found that several authorities were irrelevant to the dispute and that two cited decisions, including CE, 7 February 2018, No. 409302, did not exist; it cautioned against hallucinated or confabulated references.
- Why does No. 25BX02906 matter for legal AI risk?
- Misapplied precedent is as damaging as fabrication — read every cited case in full before relying on it.
- What does the public record establish about No. 25BX02906?
- Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
- Which source supports this No. 25BX02906 summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.