Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Provincia del Chubut v. PRA
Chubut · Oct 15, 2025
ArgentinaEditorial impact: lowmisrepresented authoritycriminaltrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Misrepresented: Other | The trial judge's written decision contained the phrase 'Aquí tienes el punto IV reeditado, sin citas y listo para copiar y pegar:', indicating use of a generative AI to re-edit Point IV; the panel found omission of citations and lack of disclosure/traceability of the AI prompt and inputs. Outcome: Judgment annuled, new trial before different judge ordered. (Not an hallucination per se, but worth adding to the database anyway.)
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether cited material supported the proposition attributed to it. The tracked outcome is Judgment annuled, new trial before different judge ordered; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- A judge pasting ChatGPT output into a ruling got the judgment annulled — disclosure and traceability are non-negotiable.
Why this matter is tracked
Misrepresented: Other | The trial judge's written decision contained the phrase 'Aquí tienes el punto IV reeditado, sin citas y listo para copiar y pegar:', indicating use of a generative AI to re-edit Point IV; the panel found omission of citations and lack of disclosure/traceability of the AI prompt and inputs. Outcome: Judgment annuled, new trial before different judge ordered. (Not an hallucination per se, but worth adding to the database anyway.)
Operational lesson
A judge pasting ChatGPT output into a ruling got the judgment annulled — disclosure and traceability are non-negotiable.
Record details
CourtChubut
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateOct 15, 2025
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeJudge
OutcomeJudgment annuled, new trial before different judge ordered
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Judgment annuled, new trial before different judge ordered
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Misrepresented: Other | The trial judge's written decision contained the phrase 'Aquí tienes el punto IV reeditado, sin citas y listo para copiar y pegar:', indicating use of a generative AI to re-edit Point IV; the panel found omission of citations and lack of disclosure/traceability of the AI prompt and inputs.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Provincia del Chubut v. PRA?
- Misrepresented: Other | The trial judge's written decision contained the phrase 'Aquí tienes el punto IV reeditado, sin citas y listo para copiar y pegar:', indicating use of a generative AI to re-edit Point IV; the panel found omission of citations and lack of disclosure/traceability of the AI prompt and inputs. Outcome: Judgment annuled, new trial before different judge ordered. (Not an hallucination per se, but worth adding to the database anyway.)
- Why does Provincia del Chubut v. PRA matter for legal AI risk?
- A judge pasting ChatGPT output into a ruling got the judgment annulled — disclosure and traceability are non-negotiable.
- What does the public record establish about Provincia del Chubut v. PRA?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Provincia del Chubut v. PRA summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.