HomeCasesShantell Robinson v. Oglala Sioux Tribe, et al.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Shantell Robinson v. Oglala Sioux Tribe, et al.

W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 9, 2025

OK / federalEditorial impact: career endingpro sefake citationsmisrepresented authorityother

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a non-existent opinion, 'Henlsey v. Alcon Labs, 277 F.3d 535 (4th Cir. 2002)'; Court noted it was non-existent and that fake opinions are not existing law. Outcome: Plaintiff's claims dismissed with prejudice.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Plaintiff's claims dismissed with prejudice; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Unidentified with Plaintiff's claims dismissed with prejudice in W.D. Oklahoma, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Unidentified with Plaintiff's claims dismissed with prejudice in W.D. Oklahoma, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

OklahomaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtW.D. Oklahoma

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit10th Circuit

DateSep 9, 2025

AI toolUnidentified

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomePlaintiff's claims dismissed with prejudice

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Plaintiff's claims dismissed with prejudice

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a non-existent opinion, 'Henlsey v. Alcon Labs, 277 F.3d 535 (4th Cir. 2002)'; Court noted it was non-existent and that fake opinions are not existing law.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Court found many filings contained non-existent and mischaracterized legal authority; Rule 11 violations for relying on fake or misrepresented authorities.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Shantell Robinson v. Oglala Sioux Tribe, et al.?: Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a non-existent opinion, 'Henlsey v. Alcon Labs, 277 F.3d 535 (4th Cir. 2002)'; Court noted it was non-existent and that fake opinions are not existing law. Outcome: Plaintiff's claims dismissed with prejudice.
Why does Shantell Robinson v. Oglala Sioux Tribe, et al. matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Unidentified with Plaintiff's claims dismissed with prejudice in W.D. Oklahoma, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Shantell Robinson v. Oglala Sioux Tribe, et al.?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Shantell Robinson v. Oglala Sioux Tribe, et al. summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Kristina Crist v. Roy Chris West, et al.W.D. Oklahoma · May 7, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Blackburn v. United StatesW.D. Oklahoma · Apr 7, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Dewayne Clark v. CoreCivicW.D. Oklahoma · Mar 6, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Zaykariya v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation, et al.W.D. Oklahoma · Jan 9, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Jane Doe 1, et al. v. Mount Saint Mary High School CorporationW.D. Oklahoma · May 13, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Allahgehovah Jones v. City of Moore, et al.W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 24, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Record details

OklahomaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtW.D. Oklahoma

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit10th Circuit

DateSep 9, 2025

AI toolUnidentified

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomePlaintiff's claims dismissed with prejudice

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a non-existent opinion, 'Henlsey v. Alcon Labs, 277 F.3d 535 (4th Cir. 2002)'; Court noted it was non-existent and that fake opinions are not existing law.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Court found many filings contained non-existent and mischaracterized legal authority; Rule 11 violations for relying on fake or misrepresented authorities.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Shantell Robinson v. Oglala Sioux Tribe, et al.?

Why does Shantell Robinson v. Oglala Sioux Tribe, et al. matter for legal AI risk?

What does the public record establish about Shantell Robinson v. Oglala Sioux Tribe, et al.?

Which source supports this Shantell Robinson v. Oglala Sioux Tribe, et al. summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.