Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 80/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Staley v. City of Elba, et al.
M.D. Alabama · Mar 31, 2026
AL / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationscivil rightstrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's response (doc. 43 at 23) purports to quote and cite 'Kidd v. Mando Am. Corp., 731 F.3d 1196, 1200 (11th Cir. 2013)', which Defendants and the court identify as a non-existent citation. The court (adopting the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation) observed that Plaintiff's filings included citations to cases and purported quotations that do not exist; Defendants pointed this out in their filing. The observation was noted but did not result in sanctions; the case was dismissed for failure to state a claim.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is the response recorded in the linked source; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with a recorded judicial response in M.D. Alabama, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's response (doc. 43 at 23) purports to quote and cite 'Kidd v. Mando Am. Corp., 731 F.3d 1196, 1200 (11th Cir. 2013)', which Defendants and the court identify as a non-existent citation. The court (adopting the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation) observed that Plaintiff's filings included citations to cases and purported quotations that do not exist; Defendants pointed this out in their filing. The observation was noted but did not result in sanctions; the case was dismissed for failure to state a claim.
Operational lesson
This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with a recorded judicial response in M.D. Alabama, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
AlabamaSingle-state evidence scope
CourtM.D. Alabama
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit11th Circuit
DateMar 31, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeSee source
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's response (doc. 43 at 23) purports to quote and cite 'Kidd v. Mando Am. Corp., 731 F.3d 1196, 1200 (11th Cir. 2013)', which Defendants and the court identify as a non-existent citation.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cites 'Est. of Osorio v. Miami-Dade Cnty., 2023 WL 4003457 (S.D. Fla. June 15, 2023)' (doc. 43 at 24), which Defendants assert and the court notes does not exist.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's objection (doc. 49 at 28) cites 'Greer v. DeKalb County, 2009 WL 10101675, at *4 (N.D. Ga. July 13, 2009)', which Defendants identify and the court records as a citation that does not exist or is falsely stated.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Staley v. City of Elba, et al.?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's response (doc. 43 at 23) purports to quote and cite 'Kidd v. Mando Am. Corp., 731 F.3d 1196, 1200 (11th Cir. 2013)', which Defendants and the court identify as a non-existent citation. The court (adopting the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation) observed that Plaintiff's filings included citations to cases and purported quotations that do not exist; Defendants pointed this out in their filing. The observation was noted but did not result in sanctions; the case was dismissed for failure to state a claim.
- Why does Staley v. City of Elba, et al. matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with a recorded judicial response in M.D. Alabama, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Staley v. City of Elba, et al.?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Staley v. City of Elba, et al. summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.