HomeCasesRonald H. Foster v. Author Success Publishing, et al.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Ronald H. Foster v. Author Success Publishing, et al.

M.D. Alabama · Oct 29, 2025

AL / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsfabricated quotescontract

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a quotation to S.E.C. v. Smyth that does not appear in Smyth and could not be located in any case; court concluded the quote was an outright fabrication. Outcome: Show Cause Order.

Why the court cared: False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a quotation to S.E.C. v. Smyth that does not appear in Smyth and could not be located in any case; court concluded the quote was an outright fabrication. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a Farley opinion as if from the Eleventh Circuit, but the court could not locate the cited Eleventh Circuit opinion and found only a different Sixth Circuit Farley decision which was unrelated.
Why it matters now: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in M.D. Alabama, with the listed outcome: Show Cause Order.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in M.D. Alabama, with the listed outcome: Show Cause Order.

Record details

AlabamaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtM.D. Alabama

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit11th Circuit

DateOct 29, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeShow Cause Order

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Show Cause Order

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a quotation to S.E.C. v. Smyth that does not appear in Smyth and could not be located in any case; court concluded the quote was an outright fabrication.
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a Farley opinion as if from the Eleventh Circuit, but the court could not locate the cited Eleventh Circuit opinion and found only a different Sixth Circuit Farley decision which was unrelated.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Ronald H. Foster v. Author Success Publishing, et al.?: False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a quotation to S.E.C. v. Smyth that does not appear in Smyth and could not be located in any case; court concluded the quote was an outright fabrication. Outcome: Show Cause Order.
Why does Ronald H. Foster v. Author Success Publishing, et al. matter for legal AI risk?: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in M.D. Alabama, with the listed outcome: Show Cause Order.
What does the public record establish about Ronald H. Foster v. Author Success Publishing, et al.?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Ronald H. Foster v. Author Success Publishing, et al. summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Michael A. DeVita v. Midtown Motors, et al.M.D. Alabama · Mar 25, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Staley v. City of Elba, et al.M.D. Alabama · Mar 31, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Chapel v. Americredit Financial Services & ExperianN.D. Alabama · May 21, 2026same jurisdiction · pro se + fabricated quotes Pleasant v. BurnsN.D. Alabama · Apr 8, 2026same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citations Martin v. Redstone Federal Credit UnionN.D. Alabama · Sep 19, 2025same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citations Sharei Torah v. HendelSC New York · Jun 1, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in M.D. Alabama, with the listed outcome: Show Cause Order.

Record details

AlabamaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtM.D. Alabama

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit11th Circuit

DateOct 29, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeShow Cause Order

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a quotation to S.E.C. v. Smyth that does not appear in Smyth and could not be located in any case; court concluded the quote was an outright fabrication.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a Farley opinion as if from the Eleventh Circuit, but the court could not locate the cited Eleventh Circuit opinion and found only a different Sixth Circuit Farley decision which was unrelated.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Ronald H. Foster v. Author Success Publishing, et al.?

Why does Ronald H. Foster v. Author Success Publishing, et al. matter for legal AI risk?

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in M.D. Alabama, with the listed outcome: Show Cause Order.

What does the public record establish about Ronald H. Foster v. Author Success Publishing, et al.?

Which source supports this Ronald H. Foster v. Author Success Publishing, et al. summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.