Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Support Community v. MPH International
N.D. California · Oct 6, 2025
CA / federalEditorial impact: highfake citationscontracttrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Court identified and ordered excision of a fabricated California appellate citation that appeared in the brief; court directed removal. Outcome: Order to refile motion without hallucinations; Counsel to send Order to Bar and client. Earlier tentative order is here.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Order to refile motion without hallucinations; Counsel to send Order to Bar and client; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- Multiple fabricated cites in one brief forces bar and client notification — mandate partner sign-off on all authorities before filing.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Court identified and ordered excision of a fabricated California appellate citation that appeared in the brief; court directed removal. Outcome: Order to refile motion without hallucinations; Counsel to send Order to Bar and client. Earlier tentative order is here.
Operational lesson
Multiple fabricated cites in one brief forces bar and client notification — mandate partner sign-off on all authorities before filing.
Record details
CaliforniaSingle-state evidence scope
CourtN.D. California
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit9th Circuit
DateOct 6, 2025
UN
AI toolUnidentified
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeOrder to refile motion without hallucinations; Counsel to send Order to Bar and client
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionYes
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
not established
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
Procedural posture
Order to refile motion without hallucinations; Counsel to send Order to Bar and client
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Court identified and ordered excision of a fabricated California appellate citation that appeared in the brief; court directed removal.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Multiple additional fabricated cases and citations appeared in Defendant's summary-judgment brief and are listed in counsel's Exhibit G; court required these be excised if motion is re-filed.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Support Community v. MPH International?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Court identified and ordered excision of a fabricated California appellate citation that appeared in the brief; court directed removal. Outcome: Order to refile motion without hallucinations; Counsel to send Order to Bar and client. Earlier tentative order is here.
- Why does Support Community v. MPH International matter for legal AI risk?
- Multiple fabricated cites in one brief forces bar and client notification — mandate partner sign-off on all authorities before filing.
- What does the public record establish about Support Community v. MPH International?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Support Community v. MPH International summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.