Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Yehuda et al. v. G.G.A.B. Real Estate Initiative and Investments Ltd.
Ashdod Small Claims Court · May 28, 2026
IsraelEditorial impact: mediumfake citationsfabricated quotesmisrepresented authoritycontract
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
In Yehuda et al. v. G.G.A.B. Real Estate Initiative and Investments Ltd., the Ashdod Small Claims Court addressed a Fabricated: Legal Norm in a lawyer filing. The linked source records that invented a completely non-existent version of Section 11(a) of the Class Actions Law, 2006. The recorded procedural consequence is Monetary Sanction. The entry is dated 2026-05-28. It supports a focused account of the authority problem and does not establish an unrecorded AI tool, motive, or wider factual finding. The underlying source should be consulted for the complete filing and any later procedural developments.
- Why the court cared
- The linked source identifies the filing problem as: Invented a completely non-existent version of Section 11(a) of the Class Actions Law, 2006.
- Why it matters now
- The source records a concrete authority-verification problem in a international proceeding and the tribunal’s documented response to it.
Why this matter is tracked
In Yehuda et al. v. G.G.A.B. Real Estate Initiative and Investments Ltd., the Ashdod Small Claims Court addressed a Fabricated: Legal Norm in a lawyer filing. The linked source records that invented a completely non-existent version of Section 11(a) of the Class Actions Law, 2006. The recorded procedural consequence is Monetary Sanction. The entry is dated 2026-05-28. It supports a focused account of the authority problem and does not establish an unrecorded AI tool, motive, or wider factual finding. The underlying source should be consulted for the complete filing and any later procedural developments.
Operational lesson
The source records a concrete authority-verification problem in a international proceeding and the tribunal’s documented response to it.
Record details
CourtAshdod Small Claims Court
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateMay 28, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeMonetary Sanction
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Monetary Sanction
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Legal Norm | Invented a completely non-existent version of Section 11(a) of the Class Actions Law, 2006
- False Quotes: Legal Norm | Cited fictional statutory language
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Miscontextualized judicial rulings.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Yehuda et al. v. G.G.A.B. Real Estate Initiative and Investments Ltd.?
- In Yehuda et al. v. G.G.A.B. Real Estate Initiative and Investments Ltd., the Ashdod Small Claims Court addressed a Fabricated: Legal Norm in a lawyer filing. The linked source records that invented a completely non-existent version of Section 11(a) of the Class Actions Law, 2006. The recorded procedural consequence is Monetary Sanction. The entry is dated 2026-05-28. It supports a focused account of the authority problem and does not establish an unrecorded AI tool, motive, or wider factual finding. The underlying source should be consulted for the complete filing and any later procedural developments.
- Why does Yehuda et al. v. G.G.A.B. Real Estate Initiative and Investments Ltd. matter for legal AI risk?
- The source records a concrete authority-verification problem in a international proceeding and the tribunal’s documented response to it.
- What does the public record establish about Yehuda et al. v. G.G.A.B. Real Estate Initiative and Investments Ltd.?
- Limited to the linked source and the documented citation or quotation issue and stated disposition; no unrecorded tool, motive, or broader litigation facts are inferred.
- Which source supports this Yehuda et al. v. G.G.A.B. Real Estate Initiative and Investments Ltd. summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.