Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 76/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Saber v. Navy Federal Credit Union
SC Pennsylvania · Jan 14, 2026
PA / stateEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationscontracttrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited 'D'Happart v. First Commonwealth Bank' with two reporter citations; the court found no such cases exist at those citations and said the authority did not support Appellant's argument.
- Why the court cared
- Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited 'D'Happart v. First Commonwealth Bank' with two reporter citations; the court found no such cases exist at those citations and said the authority did not support Appellant's argument. || Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant's brief contained several other case citations that 'do not exist'; Appellee suggested the errors resulted from use of generative AI and the court noted multiple counterfeit authorities in the brief.
- Why it matters now
- This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in SC Pennsylvania, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited 'D'Happart v. First Commonwealth Bank' with two reporter citations; the court found no such cases exist at those citations and said the authority did not support Appellant's argument.
Operational lesson
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in SC Pennsylvania, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.
Record details
PennsylvaniaSingle-state evidence scope
CourtSC Pennsylvania
Jurisdictionstate
Circuit3rd Circuit
DateJan 14, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeSee source
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited 'D'Happart v. First Commonwealth Bank' with two reporter citations; the court found no such cases exist at those citations and said the authority did not support Appellant's argument.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant's brief contained several other case citations that 'do not exist'; Appellee suggested the errors resulted from use of generative AI and the court noted multiple counterfeit authorities in the brief.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Saber v. Navy Federal Credit Union?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited 'D'Happart v. First Commonwealth Bank' with two reporter citations; the court found no such cases exist at those citations and said the authority did not support Appellant's argument.
- Why does Saber v. Navy Federal Credit Union matter for legal AI risk?
- This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in SC Pennsylvania, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.
- What does the public record establish about Saber v. Navy Federal Credit Union?
- Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
- Which source supports this Saber v. Navy Federal Credit Union summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.