Home/Cases

Complete corpus

Search legal AI risk records

Find cases, orders, courts, tools, and failure patterns. Results cover the complete global corpus; use status filters to separate allegation-only records. Judge search is available only where a judge is recorded.

Browse courts Browse judges Open map

Search

Country

US state

Editorial impact

Court

Judge / decision-maker

AI tool

Failure mode

Record status

Geographic scope: 2,236 public matters across the global corpus.Clear all filters

Attribution: ai implied unspecified

Public matterCourt / jurisdictionDateRecorded AI toolAmount Impact

Beenshoof v. Chinpro se · fake citations · civil rightsIncluded in the selected corpus viewW.D. WashingtonWA · federalMay 15, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—low Keaau Development Partnership LLC v. Lawrencefake citations · bar referral · contractIncluded in the selected corpus viewHawaii ICAHI · stateMay 15, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)$100medium Department of Justice v Wisepro se · fake citations · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewQueensland Civil and Administrative TribunalAustralia · internationalMay 13, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—low Crypto Open Patent Alliance v. Wright (2)pro se · fake citations · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewUKUnited Kingdom · internationalMay 12, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—high Jamisson Roriz de Santana Andrade v. Tribunal Superior do Trabalhofake citations · fabricated quotes · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewSupremo Tribunal FederalBrazil · internationalMay 12, 2025Implied use of MobiOffice's AI Assistant—high Rotonde v. Stewart Title Insurance Co (1)pro se · fake citations · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewSC New YorkNY · stateMay 6, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—low Nexgen Pathology Services Ltd v. Darcueil Duncanfake citations · misrepresented authority · bar referralIncluded in the selected corpus viewHigh Court of JusticeTrinidad & Tobago · internationalApr 30, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—high Anonymous v. Anonymousfake citations · misrepresented authority · familyIncluded in the selected corpus viewIsraelIsrael · internationalApr 29, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—medium Goshen Multiservice Limited v Accuro Environmental Limitedfake citations · employment · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewEmployment Tribunals (London, South)United Kingdom · internationalApr 22, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—low Vilmar Martins dos Santos v. State of Paranafake citations · fabricated quotes · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewParana StateBrazil · internationalApr 11, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—low Bischoff v. South Carolina Department of Educationpro se · fake citations · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewAdmin Law Court, S.C.United States · stateApr 10, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—low An v. Archblock, Inc.pro se · fabricated quotes · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewDelaware Ch.DE · stateApr 4, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—low Zzaman v. HMRCpro se · fake citations · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewFirst-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber)United Kingdom · internationalApr 3, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—low Boggess v. Chamnesspro se · fake citations · civil rightsIncluded in the selected corpus viewE.D. TexasTX · federalApr 1, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—low McKeown v. Paycom Payroll LLCpro se · fake citations · employmentIncluded in the selected corpus viewW.D. OklahomaOK · federalMar 31, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—low Sanders v. USApro se · fake citations · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewFed. claims courtUnited States · federalMar 31, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—low SQBox Solutions Ltd. v. Oakpro se · fake citations · fabricated quotesIncluded in the selected corpus viewBC Civil Resolution TribunalCanada · internationalMar 31, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—low Buckner v. Hilton Globalpro se · fake citations · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewW.D. KentuckyKY · federalMar 21, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—low LMN v. STC (No. 2)pro se · fake citations · employmentIncluded in the selected corpus viewEmployment Court of New ZealandNew Zealand · internationalMar 17, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—low Nguyen v. Savage Enterprisesfake citations · contract · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewE.D. ArkansasAR · federalMar 3, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)$1.0Kmedium Dog Rights v. Ministry of Agriculturefake citations · fabricated quotes · administrativeIncluded in the selected corpus viewHigh CourtIsrael · internationalFeb 28, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—medium Re Nicholsonpro se · fake citations · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewOntario SCJCanada · internationalFeb 18, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—medium Saxena v. Martinez-Hernandez et al.pro se · fake citations · fabricated quotesIncluded in the selected corpus viewD. NevadaNV · federalFeb 18, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—career ending Strong v. Rushmore Loan Management Servicespro se · fake citations · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewD. NebraskaNE · federalJan 15, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—low O’Brien v. Flick and Chamberlainpro se · fake citations · contractIncluded in the selected corpus viewS.D. FloridaFL · federalJan 10, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—career ending

Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Data cut: corpus refreshed Oct 31, 2026, 2,236 public records.

Cite this page

Bluebook: AI Vortex, Search AI hallucination cases, Legal AI Risk Tracker (updated Oct. 31, 2026), https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/cases (last visited Oct. 31, 2026).
APA: AI Vortex. (2026, October 31). Search AI hallucination cases. Legal AI Risk Tracker. Retrieved October 31, 2026, from https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/cases
URL: https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/cases (accessed 2026-10-31)

Cites the AI Vortex page, not the underlying decision; cite the court's own document for the holding.