Home/Cases

Complete corpus

Search legal AI risk records

Find cases, orders, courts, tools, and failure patterns. Results cover the complete global corpus; use status filters to separate allegation-only records. Judge search is available only where a judge is recorded.

Browse courts Browse judges Open map

Search

Country

US state

Editorial impact

Court

Judge / decision-maker

AI tool

Failure mode

Record status

Geographic scope: 2,257 public matters across the global corpus.Clear all filters

Failure: published opinion

Public matterCourt / jurisdictionDateRecorded AI toolAmount Impact

Thomas Dexter Jakes v. Duane Youngbloodfabricated quotes · misrepresented authority · published opinionFailure mode: published opinionW.D. PennsylvaniaPA · federalOct 6, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)$5.0Khigh The People v. Raziel Ruiz Alvarezfake citations · fabricated quotes · misrepresented authorityFailure mode: published opinionCA CaliforniaCA · stateOct 2, 2025Unidentified$1.5Khigh Santree v. Eveangel Hinespro se · fake citations · misrepresented authorityFailure mode: published opinionCA North CarolinaNC · stateSep 17, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—low Teniah Tercero v. Sacramento Logistics, LLC, et al.fake citations · fabricated quotes · misrepresented authorityFailure mode: published opinionE.D. CaliforniaCA · federalSep 9, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)$1.5Khigh XAI v XAH and another matterpro se · fake citations · published opinionFailure mode: published opinionFamily CourtSingapore · internationalSep 3, 2025ChatGPT—medium Oready, LLC v. GAOpro se · fake citations · misrepresented authorityFailure mode: published opinionGAOUnited States · federalAug 13, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—low CommNV, LLC v. Uprise, LLCfake citations · fabricated quotes · misrepresented authorityFailure mode: published opinionNevada DCNV · stateAug 6, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—low Victor Kholod v. Nationstar Mortgage LLCpro se · fake citations · misrepresented authorityFailure mode: published opinionM.D. PennsylvaniaPA · federalJul 22, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—low Wright Brothers Aero, Inc. B-423326.2pro se · fake citations · published opinionFailure mode: published opinionGAOUnited States · federalJul 7, 2025Unidentified—low Mandy Pecher v Josef Gregor Habscheid,fake citations · fabricated quotes · misrepresented authorityFailure mode: published opinionMichigan CCMI · stateJun 2, 2025ChatGPT$800high Powhatan County School Board v. Skinger et alpro se · fake citations · misrepresented authorityFailure mode: published opinionE.D. VirginiaVA · federalJun 2, 2025ChatGPT—medium

Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Data cut: corpus refreshed Nov 3, 2026, 2,257 public records.

Cite this page

Bluebook: AI Vortex, Search AI hallucination cases, Legal AI Risk Tracker (updated Nov. 3, 2026), https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/cases (last visited Nov. 3, 2026).
APA: AI Vortex. (2026, November 3). Search AI hallucination cases. Legal AI Risk Tracker. Retrieved November 3, 2026, from https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/cases
URL: https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/cases (accessed 2026-11-03)

Cites the AI Vortex page, not the underlying decision; cite the court's own document for the holding.

Before the next filing goes out, review the workflow behind it.

These records show where AI-assisted filings went wrong. AI Vortex works with law firms and legal teams on one AI-assisted workflow at a time: who reviews the output, who signs, and what source trail it leaves. Operations design, not legal advice.

Review a workflow