Home/Cases

Complete corpus

Search legal AI risk records

Find cases, orders, courts, tools, and failure patterns. Results cover the complete global corpus; use status filters to separate allegation-only records. Judge search is available only where a judge is recorded.

Browse courts Browse judges Open map

Search

Country

US state

Editorial impact

Court

Judge / decision-maker

AI tool

Failure mode

Record status

Geographic scope: 2,257 public matters across the global corpus.Clear all filters

Public matterCourt / jurisdictionDateRecorded AI toolAmount Impact

Robert Lafayette v. Alex Abrami et alpro se · fake citations · fabricated quotesIncluded in the selected corpus viewVermont SCVT · stateDec 18, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)$7.4Kmedium Wanyu Zhang v. National Public Radio, Inc.fake citations · fabricated quotes · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewD. DCDC · federalDec 18, 2025Google search engine AI features$1,000.00medium Russel Williams Home Services LLC v. Minleon International (USA) Limited LLC, et al.fabricated quotes · ip · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewM.D. PennsylvaniaPA · federalDec 17, 2025No tool named in source—medium Angelica E. Cruz et al. v. United States of Americafake citations · tort · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewC.D. CaliforniaCA · federalDec 16, 2025Unidentified—medium McMillian v. Zimmer US, Incfake citations · tort · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewS.D. New YorkNY · federalDec 16, 2025Unidentified$9.0Kmedium Advokatnævnet – Sagsnr. 2025-1655fake citations · contract · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewAdvokatnævnetDenmark · internationalDec 15, 2025No tool named in source—medium Braica v. Frankowski (Anthony Braica v. Tom Frankowski)pro se · fake citations · fabricated quotesIncluded in the selected corpus viewD. ConnecticutCT · federalDec 15, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—medium Tsafrir v. Goldbergpro se · fake citations · otherIncluded in the selected corpus viewSupreme CourtIsrael · internationalDec 14, 2025No tool named in source—medium Mr J Harrison v Mr D May t/a Leeds Gymnastics Academypro se · fake citations · employmentIncluded in the selected corpus viewEmployment Tribunals (Leeds)United Kingdom · internationalDec 10, 2025ChatGPT—medium Sean Gottlieb v. Adtalem Global Educationpro se · fake citations · employmentIncluded in the selected corpus viewN.D. IllinoisIL · federalDec 10, 2025No tool named in source—medium Barrette v Weverspro se · fake citations · contractIncluded in the selected corpus viewKB AlbertaCanada · internationalDec 8, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—medium Thomas Duncan v. Gridhawk et al.pro se · fake citations · fabricated quotesIncluded in the selected corpus viewW.D. TexasTX · federalDec 6, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—medium Associated Builders and Contractors v. Bucks County Community Collegefake citations · contract · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewCC PennsylvaniaPA · stateDec 5, 2025Unidentified—medium Donnie Yarn and Deshawn Murphy v. Trader Joe'spro se · fake citations · contractIncluded in the selected corpus viewD. OregonOR · federalDec 5, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—medium Mullins v. Duquesne University of the Holy Spiritpro se · fabricated quotes · civil rightsIncluded in the selected corpus viewW.D. PennsylvaniaPA · federalDec 5, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—medium Ringo v. Colquhoun Design Studio, LLCfake citations · fabricated quotes · contractIncluded in the selected corpus viewCA OregonOR · stateDec 3, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)$2.0Kmedium Taiwo v Homelets of Bath Limitedpro se · fake citations · tortIncluded in the selected corpus viewHigh CourtUnited Kingdom · internationalDec 3, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—medium Jarrus et al. v. Governor of Michigan et al.pro se · misrepresented authority · otherIncluded in the selected corpus viewE.D. MichiganMI · federalDec 2, 2025ChatGPT Plus$600medium Magee v. New Balance Athletics, Inc.pro se · fake citations · fabricated quotesIncluded in the selected corpus viewE.D. ArkansasAR · federalDec 2, 2025Unidentified—medium I.ÚS 3004/25fake citations · misrepresented authority · administrativeIncluded in the selected corpus viewÚstavní soudCzech Republic · internationalDec 1, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—medium Lothamer Tax Resolution, Inc. v. Paul Kimmel (2)pro se · fake citations · fabricated quotesIncluded in the selected corpus viewW.D. MichiganMI · federalDec 1, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)$2,900.00medium Hanson v. Nest Home Lending, LLC et al.pro se · fake citations · fabricated quotesIncluded in the selected corpus viewD. ColoradoCO · federalNov 28, 2025Unidentified—medium Carlos Maturin v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.pro se · fake citations · employmentIncluded in the selected corpus viewD. New MexicoNM · federalNov 25, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)$8.6Kmedium 0997510 BC Ltd. v. Area 15fake citations · administrative · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewBC PAABCanada · internationalNov 19, 2025Unidentified—medium DJ v SNpro se · fake citations · familyIncluded in the selected corpus viewCA AlbertaCanada · internationalNov 19, 2025Unidentified—medium

Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Data cut: corpus refreshed Nov 3, 2026, 2,257 public records.

Cite this page

Bluebook: AI Vortex, Search AI hallucination cases, Legal AI Risk Tracker (updated Nov. 3, 2026), https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/cases (last visited Nov. 3, 2026).
APA: AI Vortex. (2026, November 3). Search AI hallucination cases. Legal AI Risk Tracker. Retrieved November 3, 2026, from https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/cases
URL: https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/cases (accessed 2026-11-03)

Cites the AI Vortex page, not the underlying decision; cite the court's own document for the holding.

Before the next filing goes out, review the workflow behind it.

These records show where AI-assisted filings went wrong. AI Vortex works with law firms and legal teams on one AI-assisted workflow at a time: who reviews the output, who signs, and what source trail it leaves. Operations design, not legal advice.

Review a workflow