Public trackerCorpus refreshed Nov 3, 2026 · Latest decision Oct 29, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Home/Cases
Complete corpus

Search legal AI risk records

Find cases, orders, courts, tools, and failure patterns. Results cover the complete global corpus; use status filters to separate allegation-only records. Judge search is available only where a judge is recorded.

Geographic scope: 2,257 public matters across the global corpus.Clear all filters

403 matching matters

Showing 326-350 · Page 14 of 17

Download these 403 results (CSV)

Public matterCourt / jurisdictionDateRecorded AI toolAmountImpact
Takefman v. The Pickleball Club, LLCpro se · fake citations · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewCA Florida (3d)FL · stateAug 27, 2025Unidentified—mediumFernando Betancourt Gómez v. Colegio de Profesionalesfake citations · fabricated quotes · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewPuerto RicoPR · stateAug 22, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)$1.0KmediumClark v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.pro se · fake citations · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewE.D. MichiganMI · federalAug 19, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—mediumHolloway v Becklespro se · fake citations · contractIncluded in the selected corpus viewFirst-tier TribunalUnited Kingdom · internationalAug 12, 2025Unidentified—mediumMeital Kasantini v. Hagiva'a Proyectim Handasiim Ltdfake citations · contract · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewAshdod Magistrate CourtIsrael · internationalAug 12, 2025Unidentified—mediumGraham-Jackson v. Martin and Rock Prairie Farms, LLCpro se · fake citations · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewCA WisconsinWI · stateAug 7, 2025Unidentified$500mediumHall v. The Academy Charter Schoolfake citations · civil rights · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewE.D. New YorkNY · federalAug 7, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—mediumPinchas v. Supervisor of Insolvencypro se · fake citations · bankruptcyIncluded in the selected corpus viewJerusalem Magistrate's CourtIsrael · internationalAug 3, 2025Unidentified—mediumMarcus Groesser and Ira Hess v. Robert Phelps Hermanfake citations · contract · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewSupreme Court of The BahamasThe Bahamas · internationalAug 1, 2025ChatGPT—mediumCoronavirus Reporter Corporation v. Apple Inc.fake citations · fabricated quotes · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewN.D. CaliforniaCA · federalJul 30, 2025ChatGPT—mediumThe Father v The Motherpro se · fake citations · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewHigh CourtUnited Kingdom · internationalJul 30, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—mediumRobbins v. Martin Law Firm, P.L.fake citations · fabricated quotes · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewM.D. FloridaFL · federalJul 28, 2025Unidentified—mediumSeither & Cherry Quad Cities v. Oakland Automationfabricated quotes · misrepresented authority · contractIncluded in the selected corpus viewE.D. MichiganMI · federalJul 28, 2025Unidentified$1.5KmediumShenaar v. The Quarries Rehabilitation Fundfake citations · employment · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewTel Aviv Labor CourtIsrael · internationalJul 27, 2025Unidentified—mediumTaft v. Thomas et al.pro se · fake citations · otherIncluded in the selected corpus viewHawaiiHI · stateJul 24, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)$100mediumMcCarthy v. DEAfake citations · misrepresented authority · administrativeIncluded in the selected corpus view3rd Cir. CAUnited States · federalJul 21, 2025Unidentified—mediumUnknown case nametrialIncluded in the selected corpus viewSC New HampshireNH · stateJul 15, 2025No tool named in source$5.0KmediumKessler v. City of Atwaterfake citations · fabricated quotes · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewE.D. CaliforniaCA · federalJul 11, 2025Unidentified—mediumZlatin v. Assayag et alfake citations · contract · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewJerusalem Magistrate's CourtIsrael · internationalJul 11, 2025Unidentified—mediumLloyd’s Register Canada v. Munchang Choipro se · fake citations · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewFederal Court of CanadaCanada · internationalJul 10, 2025Unidentified—mediumCase No. 14748-08-21fake citations · fabricated quotes · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewSupreme CourtIsrael · internationalJul 9, 2025Unidentified—mediumFoster Chambers v. Village of Oak Parkpro se · appellateIncluded in the selected corpus view7th Cir. CAUnited States · federalJul 9, 2025No tool named in source—mediumCoomer v. Lindell/MyPillow, Inc. (1)fake citations · fabricated quotes · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewD. ColoradoCO · federalJul 7, 2025Co-Pilot, Westlaw’s AI, Gemini, Grok, Claude, ChatGPT, Perplexity$6.0KmediumSmith v. Gamblepro se · appellateIncluded in the selected corpus viewCA OhioOH · stateJul 7, 2025Unidentified—mediumPlonit et al. v. The Administrator General in the Tel Aviv District et al.fake citations · fabricated quotes · familyIncluded in the selected corpus viewFamily Court in Petah TikvaIsrael · internationalJul 3, 2025Unidentified—medium
Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Data cut: corpus refreshed Nov 3, 2026, 2,257 public records.

Cite this page

Bluebook

AI Vortex, Search AI hallucination cases, Legal AI Risk Tracker (updated Nov. 3, 2026), https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/cases (last visited Nov. 3, 2026).

APA

AI Vortex. (2026, November 3). Search AI hallucination cases. Legal AI Risk Tracker. Retrieved November 3, 2026, from https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/cases

URL

https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/cases (accessed 2026-11-03)

Cites the AI Vortex page, not the underlying decision; cite the court's own document for the holding.

Before the next filing goes out, review the workflow behind it.

These records show where AI-assisted filings went wrong. AI Vortex works with law firms and legal teams on one AI-assisted workflow at a time: who reviews the output, who signs, and what source trail it leaves. Operations design, not legal advice.

Review a workflow