COURT EVIDENCE REPORT

CA Texas

A print-ready review packet of the issues, recorded responses, participant context, and source-linked matters currently associated with this profile.

Matched records19

Source linked100%

Known amount totalNone recorded

Recorded rangeOct 30, 2025 – Aug 18, 2026

EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

What kinds of legal AI issues and responses appear in CA Texas?

AI Vortex currently links 19 source-linked public matters associated with CA Texas. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (17), Misrepresented authority (9) and Fabricated or altered quotations (7). Recorded responses and outcomes include No adjudicated consequence recorded (12), Warning or admonishment (6) and Dismissal or adverse disposition (1). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the court.

Every distribution below links to the exact matching records. This report does not convert corpus counts into a behavioral prediction.

OBSERVED ISSUE MIX

What problems appear in these records?

Fabricated authorities17 · 89.5%Misrepresented authority9 · 47.4%Fabricated or altered quotations7 · 36.8%

Issue categories can overlap within one matter.

RECORDED RESPONSES

How did courts or authorities respond?

No adjudicated consequence recorded12 · 63.2%Warning or admonishment6 · 31.6%Dismissal or adverse disposition1 · 5.3%Filing or pleading struck1 · 5.3%

A recorded response does not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.

PARTICIPANT CONTEXT

Who appears in these matters?

Pro Se Litigant15 · 78.9%Lawyer4 · 21.1%

MATTER CONTEXT

Which practice areas are represented?

Family7 · 36.8%Other3 · 15.8%Contract2 · 10.5%Criminal2 · 10.5%Tort2 · 10.5%

UNDERLYING EVIDENCE

Selected public records behind this report

Showing 12 of 19

Aug 18, 2026Kourradi v. ChristopherCA TexasAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Aug 5, 2026San Antonio Independent School District v. Laura Becerra (as Next Friend of J.C.)CA TexasAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Jul 31, 2026Kevin Dale Higgins v. The State of TexasCA TexasUnidentifiedSource

Jul 30, 2026In the Interest of Q.C. and P.C., ChildrenCA TexasAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Jul 30, 2026In the Interest of S.M.T. and S.J.T., ChildrenCA TexasAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Jul 16, 2026Shaddai Harris v. Iliac, LLCCA TexasAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Jul 9, 2026In the Interest of Q.C. and P.C., ChildrenCA TexasAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Jun 25, 2026Paris v. ParisCA TexasAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Jun 12, 2026Shaddai Harris v. Nadia Lyotard and Mitchell SadlerCA TexasAI (implied, unspecified)Source

May 28, 2026Christian Lavell Jennings v. Vandergriff HondaCA TexasAI (implied, unspecified)Source

May 5, 2026Amanda Adams v. Allen Butler Construction, Inc.CA TexasAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Apr 30, 2026K.C. v. D.R.CA TexasAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Open all matching records

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Scope, traceability, and limits

This report groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish general practices, sanction rates, or future behavior.

The complete docket, later history, local rules, standing orders, and controlling primary materials remain authoritative.

CONNECTED INTELLIGENCE

Related corpus profiles

United States19 shared records Texas19 shared records Fake Citations17 shared records None Adjudicated12 shared records Misrepresented Authority9 shared records Fabricated Quotes7 shared records