COURT EVIDENCE REPORT

D. New Mexico

A print-ready review packet of the issues, recorded responses, participant context, and source-linked matters currently associated with this profile.

Matched records13

Source linked100%

Known amount total$13,140

Recorded rangeOct 23, 2023 – Aug 28, 2026

EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

What kinds of legal AI issues and responses appear in D. New Mexico?

AI Vortex currently links 13 source-linked public matters associated with D. New Mexico. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (12), Fabricated or altered quotations (5) and Misrepresented authority (4). Recorded responses and outcomes include Warning or admonishment (8), Monetary sanction (4) and Bar or professional referral (3). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the court.

Every distribution below links to the exact matching records. This report does not convert corpus counts into a behavioral prediction.

OBSERVED ISSUE MIX

What problems appear in these records?

Fabricated authorities12 · 92.3%Fabricated or altered quotations5 · 38.5%Misrepresented authority4 · 30.8%

Issue categories can overlap within one matter.

RECORDED RESPONSES

How did courts or authorities respond?

Warning or admonishment8 · 61.5%Monetary sanction4 · 30.8%Bar or professional referral3 · 23.1%Dismissal or adverse disposition1 · 7.7%No adjudicated consequence recorded1 · 7.7%Professional discipline1 · 7.7%

A recorded response does not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.

PARTICIPANT CONTEXT

Who appears in these matters?

Pro Se Litigant9 · 69.2%Lawyer4 · 30.8%

MATTER CONTEXT

Which practice areas are represented?

Civil Rights7 · 53.8%Other2 · 15.4%Employment1 · 7.7%Habeas1 · 7.7%Tort1 · 7.7%

UNDERLYING EVIDENCE

Selected public records behind this report

Showing 12 of 13

Aug 28, 2026Charlie Reyes v. Bryce Bailey, et al.D. New MexicoAI (implied, unspecified)Source

May 26, 2026Sample et al v. Hilton Worldwide Holdings, IncD. New MexicoAI (implied, unspecified)Source

May 21, 2026Lowrey v. City of Rio Rancho et al. (2)D. New MexicoAI (implied, unspecified)Source

May 7, 2026Danielle L. Neri v. Board of Education for Albuquerque Public SchoolsD. New MexicoCentient AISource

May 1, 2026Rasheem Carter, et al. v. UZGlobal LLC, et al.D. New MexicoUnidentifiedSource

Nov 25, 2025Carlos Maturin v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.D. New MexicoAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Nov 5, 2025Lowrey v. City of Rio Rancho et al. (1)D. New MexicoAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Oct 30, 2025Clifford Robert Cummings v. The Estate of Forrest FennD. New MexicoAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Oct 8, 2025Lipe v. Albuquerque Public Schools (2)D. New MexicoAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Sep 22, 2025Lipe v. Albuquerque Public Schools (1)D. New MexicoAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Apr 2, 2025Dehghani v. CastroD. New MexicoUnidentifiedSource

Feb 1, 2025Tomlin v. State of New MexicoD. New MexicoAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Open all matching records

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Scope, traceability, and limits

This report groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish general practices, sanction rates, or future behavior.

The complete docket, later history, local rules, standing orders, and controlling primary materials remain authoritative.

CONNECTED INTELLIGENCE

Related corpus profiles

United States13 shared records New Mexico13 shared records Fake Citations12 shared records Warning8 shared records Fabricated Quotes5 shared records Misrepresented Authority4 shared records