COURT EVIDENCE REPORT

GAO

A print-ready review packet of the issues, recorded responses, participant context, and source-linked matters currently associated with this profile.

Matched records20

Source linked100%

Known USD amount totalNone recorded

Recorded rangeMay 7, 2025 – Sep 14, 2026

EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

What kinds of legal AI issues and responses appear in GAO?

AI Vortex currently links 20 source-linked public matters associated with GAO. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (18), Misrepresented authority (8) and Fabricated or altered quotations (3). Recorded responses and outcomes include Warning or admonishment (18), Dismissal or adverse disposition (1) and No adjudicated consequence recorded (1). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the court.

Every distribution below links to the exact matching records. This report does not convert corpus counts into a behavioral prediction.

OBSERVED ISSUE MIX

What problems appear in these records?

Fabricated authorities18 · 90%Misrepresented authority8 · 40%Fabricated or altered quotations3 · 15%

Issue categories can overlap within one matter.

RECORDED RESPONSES

How did courts or authorities respond?

Warning or admonishment18 · 90%Dismissal or adverse disposition1 · 5%No adjudicated consequence recorded1 · 5%

A recorded response does not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.

PARTICIPANT CONTEXT

Who appears in these matters?

Pro Se Litigant14 · 70%Lawyer6 · 30%

MATTER CONTEXT

Which practice areas are represented?

Administrative16 · 80%

UNDERLYING EVIDENCE

Selected public records behind this report

Showing 12 of 20

Sep 14, 2026Matter of H2L Solutions, Inc.GAONo tool named in sourceSource

Jul 31, 2026The JAAW Group, LLCGAONo tool named in sourceSource

Jun 16, 2026OS-DB-JV-2, LLCGAOUnidentifiedSource

Apr 15, 2026Matter of: LOGMET LLC, B-423066.2GAOUnidentifiedSource

Mar 26, 2026Mission Critical Project Services, Inc.GAOAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Feb 18, 2026Matter of: Adapt Forward, LLCGAOAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Feb 13, 2026G2 Ops, Inc.GAOAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Feb 12, 2026CVTEK, LLC (B-423943; B-423943.2)GAOWestlaw CoCounselSource

Jan 28, 2026Life Together Coaching, LLCGAONo tool named in sourceSource

Jan 28, 2026Matter of: Bramstedt Surgical Inc.GAOAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Dec 22, 2025Matter of: KE System Services, Inc.GAOAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Nov 24, 2025Supplying Demand, LLC (Matter of)GAONo tool named in sourceSource

Open all matching records

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Scope, traceability, and limits

This report groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish general practices, sanction rates, or future behavior.

The complete docket, later history, local rules, standing orders, and controlling primary materials remain authoritative.

CONNECTED INTELLIGENCE

Related corpus profiles

United States20 shared records Fake Citations18 shared records Warning18 shared records Misrepresented Authority8 shared records Fabricated Quotes3 shared records None Adjudicated1 shared record

Cite this page

Bluebook: AI Vortex, GAO Evidence Report, Legal AI Risk Tracker (updated Oct. 27, 2026), https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/courts/gao/report (last visited Oct. 27, 2026).
APA: AI Vortex. (2026, October 27). GAO Evidence Report. Legal AI Risk Tracker. Retrieved October 27, 2026, from https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/courts/gao/report
URL: https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/courts/gao/report (accessed 2026-10-27)

Cites the AI Vortex page, not the underlying decision; cite the court's own document for the holding.