October 2026 at a glance

MeasureValueSource
Decisions dated October 2026 in the corpus31Tracker dataset, snapshot October 20, 2026
Latest decision in the corpusOctober 15, 2026Tracker manifest
Total records in the tracker2,202Tracker, read October 21, 2026; same total on Damien Charlotin's database
US decisions / other countries27 / 4 (Argentina, Canada, Israel, United Kingdom)Tracker dataset
Self-represented party (tag "pro-se")25 of 31 (81%)Tracker dataset
Severity (tracker label): low / medium / high25 / 5 / 1Tracker dataset
Tracker coverage, all time40 mapped countries, 305 US courts, 53 US jurisdictionsTracker home page, read October 21, 2026
Final October 2026 countDue November 2, 2026This page

New matters by outcome, October 2026

Each decision can carry more than one outcome label, so the rows add up to more than 31. Labels are the tracker's own. We did not re-read the underlying orders for this count; follow the case link in the tracker for the order itself.

Outcome labelDecisionsShare of 31
none-adjudicated (label in the corpus)1135%
warning1032%
monetary (costs or fine)413%
filing or brief struck310%
case or appeal dismissed310%
bar referral26%
order to show cause13%

New matters by decision date, October 2026

Decision dateDecisions
October 1, 20265
October 2, 20264
October 5, 20261
October 6, 20262
October 7, 20267
October 8, 20264
October 9, 20262
October 13, 20263
October 14, 20262
October 15, 20261

Decisions with more than a warning, October 2026

These are the decisions in the October 2026 set whose outcome label includes costs, a struck filing, dismissal, a bar referral or an order to show cause. Open the case in the tracker for the order and its source.

Decision dateMatterCourt (tracker label)Outcome (tracker label)
October 1, 2026Droit de la famille - 261553CA QuébecAdverse Costs Order
October 1, 2026P. M. M. c/ G. A., F. M. d. S.H. s/ cobro ordinario de sumas de dineroCA MorónAppeal dismissed; Bar Referral
October 1, 2026Simpson v. PorterSC ArkansasOrder to show cause
October 2, 2026Shannon v. ShannonSC NebraskaBrief struck
October 7, 2026Butler v. The Travelers Indemnity CompanySC ConnecticutFilings struck
October 7, 2026Kid International, LLC v. City National Bank of FloridaCA Florida (4d)Adverse Costs Order
October 7, 2026Tapscott v. FarissCA IowaAppeal dismissed
October 7, 2026Washington v. JusticeCA Florida (2d)Appeal dismissed; future related pro se filings were restricted unless signed by Florida Bar counsel.
October 8, 2026Avargil et al. v. Yaakov et al.MC Nof HaGalil-NazarethReport Struck; Adverse Costs Order
October 14, 2026Davis v. Tressler and YorkCA IndianaAdverse Costs Order

How October 2026 compares with recent months

Counts are decisions by decision date in the same snapshot. Recent months are still being filled in as decisions are added to the database, so a month's count can rise after we publish it; we have not measured by how much.

Decision monthDecisions in the corpus
April 2026129
May 2026155
June 2026136
July 2026136
August 2026121
September 2026101
October 202631 (partial, through October 15, 2026)

What we left out, and why

  • Dollar totals. Only 3 of the 31 decisions carry an amount, in mixed currencies, so we do not add them up.
  • Lawyer versus litigant. The tracker tags 25 decisions as self-represented. We did not classify the other 6 one by one, so we make no claim about lawyers beyond that.
  • Which AI tool. 30 of 31 decisions have no identified tool, so a tool breakdown would mostly be "unknown".
  • A country count for the month. The tracker's home page reports all-time coverage (see the table at the top), and the raw country labels in the dataset do not map one to one to that figure, so we do not recompute it.

Where the data comes from

The tracker imports, normalizes and classifies the AI Hallucination Cases Database by Damien Charlotin (© 2026 Damien Charlotin, CC BY 4.0), which identifies court and tribunal decisions where a party relied on hallucinated content. AI Vortex adds search, review and analysis, and no endorsement by Charlotin is implied. The database covers decisions that address the issue, not every fake citation filed. See the full tracker, its case list and the downloadable dataset.

For background, see our longer pages on the AI sanctions tracker, hallucination case statistics and how the public trackers differ. If you file with AI-assisted research, the citation verification guide and the pre-filing checklist cover the steps courts keep citing in these orders.

Sources

Questions and answers

How many AI sanctions cases were there in October 2026?

31 decisions dated October 2026 are in the tracker as of October 20, 2026, with data through October 15, 2026. The final count is due November 2, 2026 and may be higher.

How many AI hallucination cases are in the tracker?

2,202 records as of October 21, 2026. The tracker is built on Damien Charlotin's AI Hallucination Cases Database, which reported the same total that day.

What are the most common outcomes?

In October 2026, the most common labels are none-adjudicated (11 decisions) and warning (10). 4 decisions include costs or a fine.

Does this page cover only lawyers?

No. 25 of 31 October 2026 decisions involve a self-represented party. The database covers any party whose filing relied on hallucinated content.

When is this page updated?

It is updated after the final October 2026 count on November 2, 2026, then again when the next month closes. The date at the top of the page shows the last update.

Operational information, not legal advice. Counts are decisions dated October 2026 in the tracker snapshot of October 20, 2026, data through October 15, 2026, and will change; the case outcomes are the tracker's labels, not our reading of each order. Prepared with AI assistance from the tracker data.

New: AI rules for lawyers and courts taking effect January 1, 2027