Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Blake Lewis v. Entergy Mississippi, LLC
S.D. Mississippi · Sep 3, 2025
MS / federalEditorial impact: mediumfake citationsmisrepresented authorityothertrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited Matherne v. Cytec Corp., 78 F. App'x 977, 978 (5th Cir. 2003) as reversing a stay; the Court could not locate that opinion and research returned an unrelated Fifth Circuit decision (United States v. Strain). Outcome: Order to show cause. In her latter response to the Court, Counsel apologised for her use of a "a non-firm approved general AI service".
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Order to show cause; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- Ban non-firm-approved consumer AI services in writing; unauthorized tool use is the fastest path to a show-cause order.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited Matherne v. Cytec Corp., 78 F. App'x 977, 978 (5th Cir. 2003) as reversing a stay; the Court could not locate that opinion and research returned an unrelated Fifth Circuit decision (United States v. Strain). Outcome: Order to show cause. In her latter response to the Court, Counsel apologised for her use of a "a non-firm approved general AI service".
Operational lesson
Ban non-firm-approved consumer AI services in writing; unauthorized tool use is the fastest path to a show-cause order.
Record details
MississippiSingle-state evidence scope
CourtS.D. Mississippi
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit5th Circuit
DateSep 3, 2025
UN
AI toolUnidentified
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeOrder to show cause
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
not established
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
Procedural posture
Order to show cause
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited Matherne v. Cytec Corp., 78 F. App'x 977, 978 (5th Cir. 2003) as reversing a stay; the Court could not locate that opinion and research returned an unrelated Fifth Circuit decision (United States v. Strain).
- Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited Von Drake v. Nat'l Sec. Agency, 156 F.3d 181, 1998 WL 546172, at *2 (5th Cir. 1998) for the proposition that an appellate court reversed a stay; the Court's searches did not locate such an opinion.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Counsel cited Fujita v. United States, 416 F. App'x 400, 402 (5th Cir. 2011) as affirming denial of a stay; the Court found the Fujita opinion actually affirmed the district court's grant of a stay and stated the stay was proper.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Blake Lewis v. Entergy Mississippi, LLC?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited Matherne v. Cytec Corp., 78 F. App'x 977, 978 (5th Cir. 2003) as reversing a stay; the Court could not locate that opinion and research returned an unrelated Fifth Circuit decision (United States v. Strain). Outcome: Order to show cause. In her latter response to the Court, Counsel apologised for her use of a "a non-firm approved general AI service".
- Why does Blake Lewis v. Entergy Mississippi, LLC matter for legal AI risk?
- Ban non-firm-approved consumer AI services in writing; unauthorized tool use is the fastest path to a show-cause order.
- What does the public record establish about Blake Lewis v. Entergy Mississippi, LLC?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Blake Lewis v. Entergy Mississippi, LLC summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.