Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Grymes Development Company v. Fodera
SC New York · Nov 10, 2025
NY / stateEditorial impact: highfake citationsfabricated quotescontracttrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Summary judgment memorandum cited and quoted a non-existent case produced by AI; court found the authority fabricated and the reliance frivolous. Outcome: Monetary Sanction (2,000 USD); Adverse Costs Order.
- Why the court cared
- Fabricated: Case Law | Summary judgment memorandum cited and quoted a non-existent case produced by AI; court found the authority fabricated and the reliance frivolous.
- Why it matters now
- This record documents a Lawyer filing issue in SC New York, with the listed outcome: Monetary Sanction (2,000 USD); Adverse Costs Order.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Summary judgment memorandum cited and quoted a non-existent case produced by AI; court found the authority fabricated and the reliance frivolous. Outcome: Monetary Sanction (2,000 USD); Adverse Costs Order.
Operational lesson
This record documents a Lawyer filing issue in SC New York, with the listed outcome: Monetary Sanction (2,000 USD); Adverse Costs Order.
Record details
New YorkSingle-state evidence scope
CourtSC New York
Jurisdictionstate
Circuit2nd Circuit
DateNov 10, 2025
UN
AI toolUnidentified
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeMonetary Sanction (2,000 USD); Adverse Costs Order
Known amount$18,993
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
not established
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
Procedural posture
Monetary Sanction (2,000 USD); Adverse Costs Order
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Summary judgment memorandum cited and quoted a non-existent case produced by AI; court found the authority fabricated and the reliance frivolous.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Grymes Development Company v. Fodera?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Summary judgment memorandum cited and quoted a non-existent case produced by AI; court found the authority fabricated and the reliance frivolous. Outcome: Monetary Sanction (2,000 USD); Adverse Costs Order.
- Why does Grymes Development Company v. Fodera matter for legal AI risk?
- This record documents a Lawyer filing issue in SC New York, with the listed outcome: Monetary Sanction (2,000 USD); Adverse Costs Order.
- What does the public record establish about Grymes Development Company v. Fodera?
- Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
- Which source supports this Grymes Development Company v. Fodera summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.