Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Chapter Kris Jackson v. Santander Consumer USA Inc., et al.
10th Cir. CA · Jun 15, 2026
/ federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsfabricated quotescontract
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed language to Walker v. City of Orem that does not appear in that decision; the brief quoted: "a district court must 'consider all pending motions and develop an adequate record' before dismissal." The court noted Walker contains no such language. Outcome: Warning.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Warning; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Unidentified with Warning in 10th Cir. CA, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed language to Walker v. City of Orem that does not appear in that decision; the brief quoted: "a district court must 'consider all pending motions and develop an adequate record' before dismissal." The court noted Walker contains no such language. Outcome: Warning.
Operational lesson
This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Unidentified with Warning in 10th Cir. CA, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
Court10th Cir. CA
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit10th Circuit
DateJun 15, 2026
UN
AI toolUnidentified
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeWarning
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
not established
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
Procedural posture
Warning
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed language to Walker v. City of Orem that does not appear in that decision; the brief quoted: "a district court must 'consider all pending motions and develop an adequate record' before dismissal." The court noted Walker contains no such language.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a proposition to United States v. Houston that the decision does not contain; the brief claimed: "failure to address pending motions constitutes procedural error." The court stated Houston contains no such proposition.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Court observed the plaintiff had used multiple fabricated (nonexistent) cases in her filings (record citations at R. vol. 2 at 262–63) though the opinion does not list each fabricated citation.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Chapter Kris Jackson v. Santander Consumer USA Inc., et al.?
- False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed language to Walker v. City of Orem that does not appear in that decision; the brief quoted: "a district court must 'consider all pending motions and develop an adequate record' before dismissal." The court noted Walker contains no such language. Outcome: Warning.
- Why does Chapter Kris Jackson v. Santander Consumer USA Inc., et al. matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Unidentified with Warning in 10th Cir. CA, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Chapter Kris Jackson v. Santander Consumer USA Inc., et al.?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Chapter Kris Jackson v. Santander Consumer USA Inc., et al. summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.