Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Jul 27, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 24, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Source-linked corpus view
10th Cir. CA
10th Cir. CA appears in 11 of 1,809 public corpus records (0.6%). This page describes the recorded dataset, not an incidence rate, prevalence of AI use, or a prediction of future outcomes.
What kinds of legal AI issues and responses appear in 10th Cir. CA?
AI Vortex currently links 11 source-linked public matters associated with 10th Cir. CA. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (11), Fabricated or altered quotations (7) and Misrepresented authority (4). Recorded responses and outcomes include Warning or admonishment (8), Bar or professional referral (1) and Dismissal or adverse disposition (1). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the court.
Every count below links to the exact matching records. The linked source, subsequent docket history, and local procedural context remain controlling.
Observed issue mix
What problems appear in these records?
Fabricated authorities11 · 100%Fabricated or altered quotations7 · 63.6%Misrepresented authority4 · 36.4%
Issue categories can overlap within a single matter.
Recorded consequences
How did courts or authorities respond?
Warning or admonishment8 · 72.7%Bar or professional referral1 · 9.1%Dismissal or adverse disposition1 · 9.1%Monetary sanction1 · 9.1%No adjudicated consequence recorded1 · 9.1%Professional discipline1 · 9.1%
Response categories can overlap and do not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.
Participant context
Who appears in these matters?
Matter context
Which practice areas are represented?
Attribution status
How is AI involvement recorded?
Unspecified attribution is not evidence that a particular vendor was used.
Corpus evolution
When were these matters recorded?
Public records in this view
Showing the most recent 11 of 11 matching records.
Gregory Ashley Moyer v. James V. Murray, et al.10th Cir. CA · US · AI (implied, unspecified)
Jul 1, 2026Andria Borsody v. Frontier Heritage Communities10th Cir. CA · US · AI (implied, unspecified)
Jun 15, 2026Chapter Kris Jackson v. Santander Consumer USA Inc., et al.10th Cir. CA · US · Unidentified
Jun 15, 2026Ryan-Michael Jarvis v. County of Teton Wyoming10th Cir. CA · US · AI (implied, unspecified)
Apr 24, 2026Kevin Lee Biglow v. Dell Technologies Inc.10th Cir. CA · US · AI (implied, unspecified)
Mar 24, 2026Martha Liliana Picon-Diaz et al. v. Pamela J. Bondi10th Cir. CA · US · AI (implied, unspecified)
Feb 13, 2026Flora Chumpitaz-Morales v. Pamela J. Bondi10th Cir. CA · US · AI (implied, unspecified)
Feb 11, 2026Thomas Carl Dodds, Jr. v. Carrie Bridges10th Cir. CA · US · ChatGPT
Feb 11, 2026Kusmin L. Amarsingh v. Frontier Airlines, Inc.10th Cir. CA · US · ChatGPT
Feb 9, 2026David Angel Sifuentes, III v. Capital One10th Cir. CA · US · AI (implied, unspecified)
Feb 6, 2026Rashonna Moore v. City of Del City10th Cir. CA · US · AI (implied, unspecified)
Dec 3, 2025Scope and limitation
This page groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish a judge’s general practices or sanction rate. For every entity type, the view is not a comparison against unobserved proceedings.
Indexing status
This entity meets the public indexing baseline of at least 3 source-linked records.