HomeCasesRyan-Michael Jarvis v. County of Teton Wyoming

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Ryan-Michael Jarvis v. County of Teton Wyoming

10th Cir. CA · Apr 24, 2026

/ federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsfabricated quotesmisrepresented authority

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

False Quotes: Case Law | Appellant attributed a quotation to Spinelli v. United States that does not appear in the opinion; court could not find the quote and suspected AI generation, so it disregarded the reliance on it. Outcome: Warning.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Warning; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Warning in 10th Cir. CA, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Warning in 10th Cir. CA, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

Court10th Cir. CA

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit10th Circuit

DateApr 24, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeWarning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

False Quotes: Case Law | Appellant attributed a quotation to Spinelli v. United States that does not appear in the opinion; court could not find the quote and suspected AI generation, so it disregarded the reliance on it.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellant cited Meechaicum v. Fountain for a holding about Eighth Amendment claims that the court found not to exist and suspected the citation was fabricated or misattributed by AI.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Ryan-Michael Jarvis v. County of Teton Wyoming?: False Quotes: Case Law | Appellant attributed a quotation to Spinelli v. United States that does not appear in the opinion; court could not find the quote and suspected AI generation, so it disregarded the reliance on it. Outcome: Warning.
Why does Ryan-Michael Jarvis v. County of Teton Wyoming matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Warning in 10th Cir. CA, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Ryan-Michael Jarvis v. County of Teton Wyoming?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Ryan-Michael Jarvis v. County of Teton Wyoming summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

David Angel Sifuentes, III v. Capital One10th Cir. CA · Feb 6, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Gregory Ashley Moyer v. James V. Murray, et al.10th Cir. CA · Jul 1, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Kevin Lee Biglow v. Dell Technologies Inc.10th Cir. CA · Mar 24, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Flora Chumpitaz-Morales v. Pamela J. Bondi10th Cir. CA · Feb 11, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Rashonna Moore v. City of Del City10th Cir. CA · Dec 3, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Christopher Gleason v. Julie MarcusCA Florida (2d) · May 13, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellant cited Meechaicum v. Fountain for a holding about Eighth Amendment claims that the court found not to exist and suspected the citation was fabricated or misattributed by AI.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Ryan-Michael Jarvis v. County of Teton Wyoming?

Why does Ryan-Michael Jarvis v. County of Teton Wyoming matter for legal AI risk?

What does the public record establish about Ryan-Michael Jarvis v. County of Teton Wyoming?

Which source supports this Ryan-Michael Jarvis v. County of Teton Wyoming summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.