HomeCasesDe Ford, Bader, and Key v. James Koutoulas and LGBCoin, LTD

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

De Ford, Bader, and Key v. James Koutoulas and LGBCoin, LTD

M.D. Florida · Dec 2, 2025

FL / federalEditorial impact: lowfake citationscontracttrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Defendants cited this opinion to support their 'meme coin' argument; the Court could not locate the decision and found the citation likely fabricated, warning that citing non-existent cases is sanctionable. Outcome: Warning.

Why the court cared: Fabricated: Case Law | Defendants cited this opinion to support their 'meme coin' argument; the Court could not locate the decision and found the citation likely fabricated, warning that citing non-existent cases is sanctionable. || Fabricated: Case Law | Defendants relied on this purported S.D.N.Y. decision; the Court's independent research could not find the opinion and concluded the citation appears fabricated. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs also identified this cited decision as non-existent; the Court noted the additional alleged hallucinated citation and admonished defendants for failing to dispute the allegation.
Why it matters now: Failing to dispute fabricated-citation allegations compounds sanctions risk; respond and concede verification failures immediately.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Failing to dispute fabricated-citation allegations compounds sanctions risk; respond and concede verification failures immediately.

Record details

FloridaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtM.D. Florida

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit11th Circuit

DateDec 2, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeWarning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Defendants cited this opinion to support their 'meme coin' argument; the Court could not locate the decision and found the citation likely fabricated, warning that citing non-existent cases is sanctionable.
Fabricated: Case Law | Defendants relied on this purported S.D.N.Y. decision; the Court's independent research could not find the opinion and concluded the citation appears fabricated.
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs also identified this cited decision as non-existent; the Court noted the additional alleged hallucinated citation and admonished defendants for failing to dispute the allegation.

Questions this record answers

What happened in De Ford, Bader, and Key v. James Koutoulas and LGBCoin, LTD?: Fabricated: Case Law | Defendants cited this opinion to support their 'meme coin' argument; the Court could not locate the decision and found the citation likely fabricated, warning that citing non-existent cases is sanctionable. Outcome: Warning.
Why does De Ford, Bader, and Key v. James Koutoulas and LGBCoin, LTD matter for legal AI risk?: Failing to dispute fabricated-citation allegations compounds sanctions risk; respond and concede verification failures immediately.
What does the public record establish about De Ford, Bader, and Key v. James Koutoulas and LGBCoin, LTD?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this De Ford, Bader, and Key v. James Koutoulas and LGBCoin, LTD summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Cames et al. v. Lowe's Home CentersM.D. Florida · Jul 16, 2026same court · fake citations + contract Leafwell, Inc. v. The Doc App, Inc. (2)M.D. Florida · Jun 9, 2026same court · fake citations + contract The Doc App, Inc. d/b/a My Florida Green v. Leafwell, Inc. (1)M.D. Florida · Nov 26, 2025same court · fake citations + contract Julia Rose v. Arts Bonita, Inc., et al.M.D. Florida · Jul 12, 2026same court · fake citations + trial Edwards v. De Cubas & Lewis, P.A.M.D. Florida · Jul 1, 2026same court · fake citations + trial Stringer v. White Cap Supply Holdings, LLCM.D. Florida · May 14, 2026same court · fake citations + trial

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Failing to dispute fabricated-citation allegations compounds sanctions risk; respond and concede verification failures immediately.

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Defendants relied on this purported S.D.N.Y. decision; the Court's independent research could not find the opinion and concluded the citation appears fabricated.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs also identified this cited decision as non-existent; the Court noted the additional alleged hallucinated citation and admonished defendants for failing to dispute the allegation.

Questions this record answers

What happened in De Ford, Bader, and Key v. James Koutoulas and LGBCoin, LTD?

Why does De Ford, Bader, and Key v. James Koutoulas and LGBCoin, LTD matter for legal AI risk?

Failing to dispute fabricated-citation allegations compounds sanctions risk; respond and concede verification failures immediately.

What does the public record establish about De Ford, Bader, and Key v. James Koutoulas and LGBCoin, LTD?

Which source supports this De Ford, Bader, and Key v. James Koutoulas and LGBCoin, LTD summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.