Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Enviro Plus Duct Cleaning v. Department of Public Works
Canadian ITT · Jun 26, 2025
CanadaEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsmisrepresented authorityadministrative
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Enviro cited a Tribunal decision titled 'MDS Nordion (PR-2001-041)' as precedent; the Tribunal found this decision does not appear to exist.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is the response recorded in the linked source; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- Procurement tribunals catch pro-se AI fabrications fast; verify every cited statutory subsection verbatim.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Enviro cited a Tribunal decision titled 'MDS Nordion (PR-2001-041)' as precedent; the Tribunal found this decision does not appear to exist.
Operational lesson
Procurement tribunals catch pro-se AI fabrications fast; verify every cited statutory subsection verbatim.
Record details
CourtCanadian ITT
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateJun 26, 2025
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeSee source
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Enviro cited a Tribunal decision titled 'MDS Nordion (PR-2001-041)' as precedent; the Tribunal found this decision does not appear to exist.
- Misrepresented: Legal Norm | Enviro cited article 506(6) of the CFTA and characterized it as requiring that 'the criteria be applied in a transparent and objective manner'; the Tribunal found that article 506(6) instead lists elements that tender notices must include and does not read as Enviro claimed.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Enviro Plus Duct Cleaning v. Department of Public Works?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Enviro cited a Tribunal decision titled 'MDS Nordion (PR-2001-041)' as precedent; the Tribunal found this decision does not appear to exist.
- Why does Enviro Plus Duct Cleaning v. Department of Public Works matter for legal AI risk?
- Procurement tribunals catch pro-se AI fabrications fast; verify every cited statutory subsection verbatim.
- What does the public record establish about Enviro Plus Duct Cleaning v. Department of Public Works?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Enviro Plus Duct Cleaning v. Department of Public Works summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.