HomeCasesFacey v. Fisher, Liane et al.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Facey v. Fisher, Liane et al.

SC New York · Sep 15, 2025

NY / stateEditorial impact: lowfake citationsmisrepresented authoritytorttrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited 'James v. City of New York, 144 AD3d 604, 605 (1st Dept 2016)'; the court found no case at that citation and the actual James decision (144 A.D.3d 466) does not support counsel's argument. Outcome: Costs Order; Disclosure Obligations.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Costs Order; Disclosure Obligations; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: Every AI-assisted cite must be Shepardized against primary sources and disclosed to the court before filing.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Every AI-assisted cite must be Shepardized against primary sources and disclosed to the court before filing.

Record details

New YorkSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtSC New York

Jurisdictionstate

Circuit2nd Circuit

DateSep 15, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeCosts Order; Disclosure Obligations

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Costs Order; Disclosure Obligations

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited 'James v. City of New York, 144 AD3d 604, 605 (1st Dept 2016)'; the court found no case at that citation and the actual James decision (144 A.D.3d 466) does not support counsel's argument.
Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited 'Johnson v. Stadtlander, 162 A.D.3d 1580 (4th Dept 2018)'; the court found no case with that caption or citation.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Counsel cited 'Board of Mgrs. of 28 Cliff St. Condominium v. Maguire, 191 AD3d 553 (1st Dept 2021)'; the court found no such citation and the actual Board of Managers case (191 A.D.3d 25) does not support the argument cited.
Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited 'Xiong v. Knight, 80 A.D.3d 1055 (3d Dept 2011)'; the court found no such case under that caption/citation (citation appears to correspond to a different caption).

Questions this record answers

What happened in Facey v. Fisher, Liane et al.?: Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited 'James v. City of New York, 144 AD3d 604, 605 (1st Dept 2016)'; the court found no case at that citation and the actual James decision (144 A.D.3d 466) does not support counsel's argument. Outcome: Costs Order; Disclosure Obligations.
Why does Facey v. Fisher, Liane et al. matter for legal AI risk?: Every AI-assisted cite must be Shepardized against primary sources and disclosed to the court before filing.
What does the public record establish about Facey v. Fisher, Liane et al.?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Facey v. Fisher, Liane et al. summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Polanco v. Brooklyn Rose LLCSC New York · Jun 16, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Cassata v. Michael Macrina Architect, P.C.SC New York · Jan 27, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Wurtenberg v. The City of New YorkSC New York · Jan 12, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Keefe v. BMakin Film LtdSC New York · Apr 24, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Kevin Krzeminski v. Janine McQuillanSC New York · Jul 6, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Sharei Torah v. HendelSC New York · Jun 1, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Every AI-assisted cite must be Shepardized against primary sources and disclosed to the court before filing.

Record details

New YorkSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtSC New York

Jurisdictionstate

Circuit2nd Circuit

DateSep 15, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeCosts Order; Disclosure Obligations

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited 'Johnson v. Stadtlander, 162 A.D.3d 1580 (4th Dept 2018)'; the court found no case with that caption or citation.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Counsel cited 'Board of Mgrs. of 28 Cliff St. Condominium v. Maguire, 191 AD3d 553 (1st Dept 2021)'; the court found no such citation and the actual Board of Managers case (191 A.D.3d 25) does not support the argument cited.

Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited 'Xiong v. Knight, 80 A.D.3d 1055 (3d Dept 2011)'; the court found no such case under that caption/citation (citation appears to correspond to a different caption).

Questions this record answers

What happened in Facey v. Fisher, Liane et al.?

Why does Facey v. Fisher, Liane et al. matter for legal AI risk?

Every AI-assisted cite must be Shepardized against primary sources and disclosed to the court before filing.

What does the public record establish about Facey v. Fisher, Liane et al.?

Which source supports this Facey v. Fisher, Liane et al. summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.