Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
In re Jackson Hospital & Clinic, Inc., et al.
M.D. Alabama (Bankruptcy) · Nov 20, 2025
AL / federalEditorial impact: highfake citationsfabricated quotesmisrepresented authoritybankruptcy
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Court found pervasive fabricated citations in Progressive's Motion to Reconsider after comparing cited authorities to the arguments. Outcome: Public Reprimand; Revocation of pro hac vice privileges; Order to Serve Order on Clients; Diffusion of Order to Counsel's Bars. Show Cause Order here. Law firm explained what happened here.In the ultimate order, the court noted that "In terms of competence, the threat to attorneys using generative artificial intelligence platforms powered by large language models is two-fold.…
- Why the court cared
- Fabricated: Case Law | Court found pervasive fabricated citations in Progressive's Motion to Reconsider after comparing cited authorities to the arguments. || False Quotes: Case Law | Court identified false quotations attributed to legal authorities in the Motion to Reconsider (misstated or invented quotations). || Misrepresented: Legal Norm | Court found misleading and misrepresented statements of legal authority and doctrine in Progressive's filings, consistent with objections from DIP Lender and Debtors.
- Why it matters now
- Revoking pro hac vice and notifying the attorney's home bar is now standard — pervasive fabrications are treated as competence failures.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Court found pervasive fabricated citations in Progressive's Motion to Reconsider after comparing cited authorities to the arguments. Outcome: Public Reprimand; Revocation of pro hac vice privileges; Order to Serve Order on Clients; Diffusion of Order to Counsel's Bars. Show Cause Order here. Law firm explained what happened here.In the ultimate order, the court noted that "In terms of competence, the threat to attorneys using generative artificial intelligence platforms powered by large language models is two-fold. First, danger exists that the attorney does not understand how the technology functions, believing that the output is real instead of “realistic-looking."."In finding that the law firm acted with integrity, the Court noted with approval that it had repaid the other side's fees, to the tune of 55,721.2 USD.
Operational lesson
Revoking pro hac vice and notifying the attorney's home bar is now standard — pervasive fabrications are treated as competence failures.
Record details
AlabamaSingle-state evidence scope
CourtM.D. Alabama (Bankruptcy)
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit11th Circuit
DateNov 20, 2025
UN
AI toolUnidentified
Party typeLawyer
OutcomePublic Reprimand; Revocation of pro hac vice privileges; Order to Serve Order on Clients; Diffusion of Order to Counsel's Bars
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionYes
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
not established
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
Procedural posture
Public Reprimand; Revocation of pro hac vice privileges; Order to Serve Order on Clients; Diffusion of Order to Counsel's Bars
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Court found pervasive fabricated citations in Progressive's Motion to Reconsider after comparing cited authorities to the arguments.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Court identified false quotations attributed to legal authorities in the Motion to Reconsider (misstated or invented quotations).
- Misrepresented: Legal Norm | Court found misleading and misrepresented statements of legal authority and doctrine in Progressive's filings, consistent with objections from DIP Lender and Debtors.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in In re Jackson Hospital & Clinic, Inc., et al.?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Court found pervasive fabricated citations in Progressive's Motion to Reconsider after comparing cited authorities to the arguments. Outcome: Public Reprimand; Revocation of pro hac vice privileges; Order to Serve Order on Clients; Diffusion of Order to Counsel's Bars. Show Cause Order here. Law firm explained what happened here.In the ultimate order, the court noted that "In terms of competence, the threat to attorneys using generative artificial intelligence platforms powered by large language models is two-fold.…
- Why does In re Jackson Hospital & Clinic, Inc., et al. matter for legal AI risk?
- Revoking pro hac vice and notifying the attorney's home bar is now standard — pervasive fabrications are treated as competence failures.
- What does the public record establish about In re Jackson Hospital & Clinic, Inc., et al.?
- Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
- Which source supports this In re Jackson Hospital & Clinic, Inc., et al. summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.