HomeCasesJorge Paredes Guevara v. A&P Restaurant Corp., et al.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Jorge Paredes Guevara v. A&P Restaurant Corp., et al.

S.D. New York · Nov 18, 2025

NY / federalEditorial impact: lowfake citationsfabricated quotesmisrepresented authorityemployment

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited Marrero v. Camden Steel Co., 850 F. Supp. 188 (D.N.J. 1994); court identified this authority as non-existent.

Why the court cared: Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited Marrero v. Camden Steel Co., 850 F. Supp. 188 (D.N.J. 1994); court identified this authority as non-existent. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Counsel cited Baldwin v. Trailer Inns, Inc., 266 F.3d 1104, 1110–11 (9th Cir. 2001) for an FMLA proposition; court noted Baldwin does not mention the FMLA and involves FLSA/breach of contract issues. || Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited Kennedy v. Cmty. Action Servs., 107 F. Supp. 2d 993 (N.D. Ind. 2000); court identified this authority as non-existent. || False Quotes: Case Law | Counsel attributed a non-existent quote to Johnson v. City of Shelby, 574 U.S. 10 (2014); court noted the quoted language does not appear in Johnson. || False Quotes: Legal Norm | Counsel quoted non-existent provisions of NYLL § 215 (statutory language the court found was not present in the statute).
Why it matters now: Fabricated statutory quotes (NYLL §215) are as damning as fake cases — verify statutes against the code, not AI.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited Marrero v. Camden Steel Co., 850 F. Supp. 188 (D.N.J. 1994); court identified this authority as non-existent.

Operational lesson

Fabricated statutory quotes (NYLL §215) are as damning as fake cases — verify statutes against the code, not AI.

Record details

New YorkSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtS.D. New York

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit2nd Circuit

DateNov 18, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeSee source

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

5 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited Marrero v. Camden Steel Co., 850 F. Supp. 188 (D.N.J. 1994); court identified this authority as non-existent.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Counsel cited Baldwin v. Trailer Inns, Inc., 266 F.3d 1104, 1110–11 (9th Cir. 2001) for an FMLA proposition; court noted Baldwin does not mention the FMLA and involves FLSA/breach of contract issues.
Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited Kennedy v. Cmty. Action Servs., 107 F. Supp. 2d 993 (N.D. Ind. 2000); court identified this authority as non-existent.
False Quotes: Case Law | Counsel attributed a non-existent quote to Johnson v. City of Shelby, 574 U.S. 10 (2014); court noted the quoted language does not appear in Johnson.
False Quotes: Legal Norm | Counsel quoted non-existent provisions of NYLL § 215 (statutory language the court found was not present in the statute).

Questions this record answers

What happened in Jorge Paredes Guevara v. A&P Restaurant Corp., et al.?: Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited Marrero v. Camden Steel Co., 850 F. Supp. 188 (D.N.J. 1994); court identified this authority as non-existent.
Why does Jorge Paredes Guevara v. A&P Restaurant Corp., et al. matter for legal AI risk?: Fabricated statutory quotes (NYLL §215) are as damning as fake cases — verify statutes against the code, not AI.
What does the public record establish about Jorge Paredes Guevara v. A&P Restaurant Corp., et al.?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Jorge Paredes Guevara v. A&P Restaurant Corp., et al. summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Sana Hazina Butler v. Fidelity Management & Research Company LLCS.D. New York · Apr 30, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Burlingame v. Argo Private Client Group, Ltd. et al.S.D. New York · Dec 17, 2025same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Saregama India Ltd. v. B.A., et al.S.D. New York · Dec 3, 2025same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Tameer Peak v. Onika Tanya Maraj-Petty, et al.S.D. New York · Nov 26, 2025same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Yakov Magdalasov v. ByteDance Inc., TikTok Inc., and Maria MalvarS.D. New York · Nov 24, 2025same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Mitchell Taylor Button & Dusty Button v. Juliet Doherty et al.S.D. New York · Oct 18, 2025same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology

Record details

New YorkSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtS.D. New York

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit2nd Circuit

DateNov 18, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeSee source

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

5 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited Marrero v. Camden Steel Co., 850 F. Supp. 188 (D.N.J. 1994); court identified this authority as non-existent.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Counsel cited Baldwin v. Trailer Inns, Inc., 266 F.3d 1104, 1110–11 (9th Cir. 2001) for an FMLA proposition; court noted Baldwin does not mention the FMLA and involves FLSA/breach of contract issues.

Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited Kennedy v. Cmty. Action Servs., 107 F. Supp. 2d 993 (N.D. Ind. 2000); court identified this authority as non-existent.

False Quotes: Case Law | Counsel attributed a non-existent quote to Johnson v. City of Shelby, 574 U.S. 10 (2014); court noted the quoted language does not appear in Johnson.

False Quotes: Legal Norm | Counsel quoted non-existent provisions of NYLL § 215 (statutory language the court found was not present in the statute).

Questions this record answers

What happened in Jorge Paredes Guevara v. A&P Restaurant Corp., et al.?

Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited Marrero v. Camden Steel Co., 850 F. Supp. 188 (D.N.J. 1994); court identified this authority as non-existent.

Why does Jorge Paredes Guevara v. A&P Restaurant Corp., et al. matter for legal AI risk?

Fabricated statutory quotes (NYLL §215) are as damning as fake cases — verify statutes against the code, not AI.

What does the public record establish about Jorge Paredes Guevara v. A&P Restaurant Corp., et al.?

Which source supports this Jorge Paredes Guevara v. A&P Restaurant Corp., et al. summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.