Public trackerCorpus refreshed Sep 11, 2026 · Latest decision Sep 9, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Anthropic
Source-linked corpus view

Claude

An AI assistant from Anthropic used for analysis, writing, question answering, coding, and document work. Claude appears in 18 of 2,038 public corpus records (0.9%). This page describes the recorded dataset, not an incidence rate, prevalence of AI use, or a prediction of future outcomes.

ProviderAnthropic
Product categoryGeneral-purpose AI assistant
Product referenceOfficial product site
Evidence boundaryNamed only where recorded
Matched records18
Corpus denominator2,038
Source linked100%
Latest trackedSep 9, 2026
Evidence-based answer

What issues and consequences appear in records that identify Claude?

AI Vortex currently links 18 source-linked public matters that identify Claude. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (14), Fabricated or altered quotations (12) and Misrepresented authority (9). Recorded responses and outcomes include Monetary sanction (10), Bar or professional referral (5) and Professional discipline (5). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the tool.

Every count below links to the exact matching records. The linked source, subsequent docket history, and local procedural context remain controlling.

Leading issue signalFabricated authorities14 records
Leading recorded responseMonetary sanction10 records
Known numeric amounts$65,0128 known · 2 unquantified
Recorded date rangeOct 10, 2024through Sep 9, 2026
Observed issue mix

What problems appear in these records?

Issue categories can overlap within a single matter.

Recorded consequences

How did courts or authorities respond?

Response categories can overlap and do not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.

Participant context

Who appears in these matters?

Matter context

Which practice areas are represented?

Attribution status

How is AI involvement recorded?

Unspecified attribution is not evidence that a particular vendor was used.

Corpus evolution

When were these matters recorded?

Public records in this view

Showing the most recent 18 of 18 matching records.

Beus Gilbert PLLC v. Brigham Young University et al.D. Utah · UT · ClearBrief, Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini
Sep 9, 2026
Joann LeDoux v. Outliers, Inc. (2)W.D. Washington · WA · Claude and ChatGPT
Aug 18, 2026
Barteca Holdings v. TacobarnD. Connecticut · CT · Open Law; Claude; ChatGPT
Aug 4, 2026
Kleyman Law Group, P.C. v. KaloidisSC New York · NY · Claude and other generative AI platforms
Aug 4, 2026
Michael L. Ruiz v. Magellan Financial & Insurance Services (1)D. Arizona · AZ · Claude AI
Jul 28, 2026
Joann LeDoux v. Outliers, Inc. (1)W.D. Washington · WA · ChatGPT, Claude
Jul 24, 2026
Mullins v. Duquesne University of the Holy SpiritW.D. Pennsylvania · PA · Claude
Jul 15, 2026
Joseph Guy v. AFGEN.D. California · CA · Claude
May 13, 2026
Barber v. MorawaCA Michigan · MI · Claude, ChatGPT, Westlaw, Lexis
May 5, 2026
Jessica Fuller v. Hyde School, et al.D. Maine · ME · Claude or ChatGPT
May 5, 2026
Buchanan v. Vuori, Inc.N.D. California · CA · ChatGPT-4, OpenAI, Claude, Clear Brief, Lexis Nexis & Westlaw
Nov 20, 2025
JNE24 v Minister for Immigration and CitizenshipFederal Circuit and Family Court · Australia · Claude AI, Microsoft Copilot
Aug 15, 2025
Gurpreet Kaur v. Captain Joel DessoN.D. New York · NY · Claude Sonnet 4
Jul 9, 2025
Coomer v. Lindell/MyPillow, Inc. (1)D. Colorado · CO · Co-Pilot, Westlaw’s AI, Gemini, Grok, Claude, ChatGPT, Perplexity
Jul 7, 2025
Mintvest Capital, LTD v. NYDIG Trust Company, et al.D. Puerto Rico · PR · Claude
Jun 23, 2025
Concord v. AnthropicN.D. California · CA · Claude.ai
May 23, 2025
Gauthier v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.E.D. Texas · TX · Claude
Nov 25, 2024
Iovino v. Michael Stapleton Associates, Ltd.W.D. Virginia · VA · Claude, Westlaw, LexisNexis
Oct 10, 2024
Open all matching records

Scope and limitation

This page groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish a judge’s general practices or sanction rate. For every entity type, the view is not a comparison against unobserved proceedings.

Product names and marks identify recorded tools only. AI Vortex does not imply vendor affiliation, endorsement, product-wide failure rates, or involvement beyond the linked public records.

Indexing and evidence status

This public entity profile is indexable and meets the evidence-depth baseline of at least 3 source-linked records.