HomeCasesMS (Bangladesh)

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 95/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

MS (Bangladesh)

Immigration and Asylum Chamber · Aug 12, 2025

GBEditorial impact: highfake citationsimmigrationtrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Grounds of appeal cited a non-existent Court of Appeal authority 'Y (China)' as though it dealt with undue weight on delay; Tribunal found the case does not exist and was generated by ChatGPT. Outcome: Referred to the Bar Standards Board for investigation. Underlying judgment (in which the hallucination had been observed) is here.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Referred to the Bar Standards Board for investigation; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: Handing the Panel ChatGPT-fabricated 'Y (China)' printouts triggered BSB referral — ban consumer AI from appellate immigration bundles.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Handing the Panel ChatGPT-fabricated 'Y (China)' printouts triggered BSB referral — ban consumer AI from appellate immigration bundles.

Record details

CourtImmigration and Asylum Chamber

Jurisdictioninternational

CircuitNot recorded

DateAug 12, 2025

AI toolChatGPT

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeReferred to the Bar Standards Board for investigation

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionYes

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

ChatGPT is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Referred to the Bar Standards Board for investigation

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Grounds of appeal cited a non-existent Court of Appeal authority 'Y (China)' as though it dealt with undue weight on delay; Tribunal found the case does not exist and was generated by ChatGPT.
Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions | Printed material handed to the Panel comprised internet printouts with misleading statements referencing the fictitious 'Y (China)' and mis-associating it with the citation for YH (Iraq).

Questions this record answers

What happened in MS (Bangladesh)?: Fabricated: Case Law | Grounds of appeal cited a non-existent Court of Appeal authority 'Y (China)' as though it dealt with undue weight on delay; Tribunal found the case does not exist and was generated by ChatGPT. Outcome: Referred to the Bar Standards Board for investigation. Underlying judgment (in which the hallucination had been observed) is here.
Why does MS (Bangladesh) matter for legal AI risk?: Handing the Panel ChatGPT-fabricated 'Y (China)' printouts triggered BSB referral — ban consumer AI from appellate immigration bundles.
What does the public record establish about MS (Bangladesh)?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this MS (Bangladesh) summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

That Xiong v. Minga Wofford (1)E.D. California · Jan 22, 2026fake citations + immigration · same recorded tool: ChatGPT AK v Secretary of State for the Home DepartmentUpper Tribunal · Oct 6, 2025fake citations + immigration · same recorded tool: ChatGPT REDACTED v. United States Citizenship and Immigration ServicesD. Oregon · May 19, 2026fake citations + immigration In the Matter of Janelle Melissa Lewis, an attorney and counselor-at-lawApp. Div. 1st Dept (NY) · May 14, 2026fake citations + immigration Oscar Danilo Montealto Garcia v. Todd Lyons, et al.C.D. California · May 14, 2026fake citations + immigration Henri Giovani Morales Jimenez v. Christopher ShanahanE.D. New York · May 13, 2026fake citations + immigration

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Handing the Panel ChatGPT-fabricated 'Y (China)' printouts triggered BSB referral — ban consumer AI from appellate immigration bundles.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions | Printed material handed to the Panel comprised internet printouts with misleading statements referencing the fictitious 'Y (China)' and mis-associating it with the citation for YH (Iraq).

Questions this record answers

What happened in MS (Bangladesh)?

Why does MS (Bangladesh) matter for legal AI risk?

Handing the Panel ChatGPT-fabricated 'Y (China)' printouts triggered BSB referral — ban consumer AI from appellate immigration bundles.

What does the public record establish about MS (Bangladesh)?

Which source supports this MS (Bangladesh) summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.