Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Pooja Ramesh Singh v. Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. & Anr.
Supreme Court · Jul 2, 2026
IndiaEditorial impact: lowfake citationsfabricated quotestrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | NCLT relied on the citation 'ICICI Bank Ltd. v. Urban Infrastructure Real Estate Ltd., (2019) 16 SCC 528' which the Supreme Court found to be a non-existent citation. Outcome: NCLT and NCLAT judgments set aside. The Supreme Court found that the NCLT (and by affirmation the NCLAT) relied on AI-generated, non-existent case law and misattributed paragraphs presented as precedents.…
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is NCLT and NCLAT judgments set aside; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes involving AI (implied, unspecified) with NCLT and NCLAT judgments set aside in Supreme Court, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | NCLT relied on the citation 'ICICI Bank Ltd. v. Urban Infrastructure Real Estate Ltd., (2019) 16 SCC 528' which the Supreme Court found to be a non-existent citation. Outcome: NCLT and NCLAT judgments set aside. The Supreme Court found that the NCLT (and by affirmation the NCLAT) relied on AI-generated, non-existent case law and misattributed paragraphs presented as precedents. The Court held such reliance amounts to a subversion of the rule of law and declared zero tolerance for citing unverified AI-generated precedents, set aside the impugned orders, restored the Section 7 petition, and directed the Bar Council of India to formulate guidance and disciplinary measures.
Operational lesson
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes involving AI (implied, unspecified) with NCLT and NCLAT judgments set aside in Supreme Court, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
CourtSupreme Court
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateJul 2, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeJudge
OutcomeNCLT and NCLAT judgments set aside
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
NCLT and NCLAT judgments set aside
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
6 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | NCLT relied on the citation 'ICICI Bank Ltd. v. Urban Infrastructure Real Estate Ltd., (2019) 16 SCC 528' which the Supreme Court found to be a non-existent citation.
- Fabricated: Case Law | NCLT relied on 'V.S. Dempo & Co. Ltd. v. Reliance Communications Ltd., (2021) 10 SCC 176', which the Supreme Court determined is a non-existent citation.
- False Quotes: Case Law | NCLT cited Canara Bank v. N.G. Subbaraya Setty & Anr., (2018) 16 SCC 228 but relied on a paragraph not found in the reported judgment.
- Fabricated: Case Law | NCLT relied on 'Sarbjit Singh v. Union Bank of India, (2022) 7 SCC 464', which the Supreme Court found to be a non-existent citation.
- False Quotes: Case Law | NCLT attributed a non-existent paragraph to 'State Bank of India v. M/s Shree Ram Urban Infrastructure Ltd., 2020 SCC OnLine SC 341'; Supreme Court found the paragraph non-existent and the correct cause title is M. Subramaniam v. S. Janaki, (2020) 16 SCC 728.
- False Quotes: Case Law | NCLT cited Everest Kento Cylinders Ltd. v. Union of India (2015) 2 SCC 1 but relied on a paragraph that does not exist in that reported judgment.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Pooja Ramesh Singh v. Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. & Anr.?
- Fabricated: Case Law | NCLT relied on the citation 'ICICI Bank Ltd. v. Urban Infrastructure Real Estate Ltd., (2019) 16 SCC 528' which the Supreme Court found to be a non-existent citation. Outcome: NCLT and NCLAT judgments set aside. The Supreme Court found that the NCLT (and by affirmation the NCLAT) relied on AI-generated, non-existent case law and misattributed paragraphs presented as precedents.…
- Why does Pooja Ramesh Singh v. Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. & Anr. matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes involving AI (implied, unspecified) with NCLT and NCLAT judgments set aside in Supreme Court, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Pooja Ramesh Singh v. Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. & Anr.?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Pooja Ramesh Singh v. Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. & Anr. summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.