Public trackerCorpus refreshed Sep 11, 2026 路 Latest decision Sep 9, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
馃嚠馃嚦
Source-linked corpus view

India

India appears in 15 of 2,038 public corpus records (0.7%). This page describes the recorded dataset, not an incidence rate, prevalence of AI use, or a prediction of future outcomes.

Matched records15
Corpus denominator2,038
Source linked100%
Latest trackedSep 2, 2026
Evidence-based answer

What patterns appear in the public records associated with India?

AI Vortex currently links 15 source-linked public matters associated with India. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (14), Misrepresented authority (4) and Fabricated or altered quotations (2). Recorded responses and outcomes include No adjudicated consequence recorded (11), Warning or admonishment (2) and Dismissal or adverse disposition (1). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the country.

Every count below links to the exact matching records. The linked source, subsequent docket history, and local procedural context remain controlling.

Leading issue signalFabricated authorities14 records
Leading recorded responseNo adjudicated consequence recorded11 records
Known numeric amounts$11 known 路 0 unquantified
Recorded date rangeDec 30, 2024through Sep 2, 2026
Observed issue mix

What problems appear in these records?

Issue categories can overlap within a single matter.

Recorded consequences

How did courts or authorities respond?

Response categories can overlap and do not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.

Participant context

Who appears in these matters?

Matter context

Which practice areas are represented?

Attribution status

How is AI involvement recorded?

Unspecified attribution is not evidence that a particular vendor was used.

Corpus evolution

When were these matters recorded?

Public records in this view

Showing the most recent 15 of 15 matching records.

Vijay Ghanshyam Gadiya v. Union of India & Anr.Supreme Court of IndiaIndiaAI (implied, unspecified)
Sep 2, 2026
Faiz Enterprise v. State Tax Officer, Unit-67, Surat & Anr.Gujarat High CourtIndiaUnidentified
Aug 20, 2026
W.P.(C) 6049/2026 & W.P.(C) 6051/2026High Court of DelhiIndiaAI (implied, unspecified)
Jul 17, 2026
Pooja Ramesh Singh v. Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. & Anr.Supreme CourtIndiaAI (implied, unspecified)
Jul 2, 2026
Principal, Woodland House School & Ors. v. Shakeel Ahmad MalikHC Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh, SrinagarIndiaAI (implied, unspecified)
Jun 6, 2026
Pooja Ramesh Singh v. Jammu & Kashmir BankSupreme CourtIndiaAI (implied, unspecified)
May 5, 2026
SNV Aviation Pvt Ltd v. ABS Tour and TravelsDistrict Judge (Commercial)-02, South-East, Saket CourtIndiaAI (implied, unspecified)
Apr 30, 2026
Gummadi Usha Rani & Anr. v. Sure Mallikarjuna Rao & Anr.Supreme CourtIndiaAI (implied, unspecified)
Feb 27, 2026
Gummadi Usha Rani v. Sure Mallikarjuna RaoHC Andhra PradeshIndiaUnidentified
Jan 25, 2026
Mr. Deepak s/o Shivkumar Bahry v. Heart & Soul Entertainment Ltd.HC BombayIndiaAI (implied, unspecified)
Jan 7, 2026
Omkara Assets Reconstruction Private Limited v. Gstaad Hotels Private LimitedSupreme CourtIndiaUnidentified
Dec 8, 2025
MS J M Jain Prop Sh Jeetmal Choraria v. Union of India & Ors.Delhi High CourtIndiaAI (implied, unspecified)
Nov 18, 2025
KMG Wires Private Limited v. The National Faceless Assessment Centre et al.High Court BombayIndiaAI (implied, unspecified)
Oct 6, 2025
Greenopolis Welfare Association (GWA) v. Narender Singh et al.Dehli High CourtIndiaUnidentified
Sep 25, 2025
Buckeye Trust v. PCITIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), BangaloreIndiaAI (implied, unspecified)
Dec 30, 2024
Open all matching records

Scope and limitation

This page groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish a judge鈥檚 general practices or sanction rate. For every entity type, the view is not a comparison against unobserved proceedings.

Indexing and evidence status

This public entity profile is indexable and meets the evidence-depth baseline of at least 3 source-linked records.