Public trackerCorpus refreshed Oct 26, 2026 路 Latest decision Oct 23, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
馃嚠馃嚦
Source-linked corpus view

India

India appears in 16 of 2,215 public corpus records (0.7%). This page describes the recorded dataset, not an incidence rate, prevalence of AI use, or a prediction of future outcomes.

Matched records16
Corpus denominator2,215
Source linked100%
Latest trackedOct 15, 2026
Evidence-based answer

What patterns appear in the public records associated with India?

AI Vortex currently links 16 source-linked public matters associated with India. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (14), Misrepresented authority (4) and Fabricated or altered quotations (2). Recorded responses and outcomes include No adjudicated consequence recorded (12), Dismissal or adverse disposition (1) and Monetary sanction (1). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the country.

Every count below links to the exact matching records. The linked source, subsequent docket history, and local procedural context remain controlling.

Leading issue signalFabricated authorities14 records
Leading recorded responseNo adjudicated consequence recorded12 records
Known USD amountsNone recorded0 known 路 1 unquantified
Recorded date rangeDec 30, 2024through Oct 15, 2026
Observed issue mix

What problems appear in these records?

Issue categories can overlap within a single matter.

Recorded consequences

How did courts or authorities respond?

Response categories can overlap and do not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.

Participant context

Who appears in these matters?

Matter context

Which practice areas are represented?

Attribution status

How is AI involvement recorded?

Unspecified attribution is not evidence that a particular vendor was used.

Corpus evolution

When were these matters recorded?

Public records in this view

Showing the most recent 16 of 16 matching records.

Omkara Assets Reconstruction Private Limited v. Gstaad Hotels Private LimitedSupreme Court 路 India 路 Unidentified
Oct 15, 2026
Vijay Ghanshyam Gadiya v. Union of India & Anr.Supreme Court of India 路 India 路 AI (implied, unspecified)
Sep 2, 2026
Faiz Enterprise v. State Tax Officer, Unit-67, Surat & Anr.Gujarat High Court 路 India 路 Unidentified
Aug 20, 2026
W.P.(C) 6049/2026 & W.P.(C) 6051/2026High Court of Delhi 路 India 路 No tool named in source
Jul 17, 2026
Pooja Ramesh Singh v. Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. & Anr.Supreme Court 路 India 路 AI (implied, unspecified)
Jul 2, 2026
Principal, Woodland House School & Ors. v. Shakeel Ahmad MalikHC Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh, Srinagar 路 India 路 Unidentified
Jun 6, 2026
Pooja Ramesh Singh v. Jammu & Kashmir BankSupreme Court 路 India 路 AI (implied, unspecified)
May 5, 2026
SNV Aviation Pvt Ltd v. ABS Tour and TravelsDistrict Judge (Commercial)-02, South-East, Saket Court 路 India 路 AI (implied, unspecified)
Apr 30, 2026
Gummadi Usha Rani & Anr. v. Sure Mallikarjuna Rao & Anr.Supreme Court 路 India 路 AI (implied, unspecified)
Feb 27, 2026
Gummadi Usha Rani v. Sure Mallikarjuna RaoHC Andhra Pradesh 路 India 路 Unidentified
Jan 25, 2026
Gayathri v. Guru Reddy & Ors., O.S. No. 4956/2011CCSC Bengaluru 路 India 路 AI (implied, unspecified)
Jan 21, 2026
Mr. Deepak s/o Shivkumar Bahry v. Heart & Soul Entertainment Ltd.HC Bombay 路 India 路 AI (implied, unspecified)
Jan 7, 2026
MS J M Jain Prop Sh Jeetmal Choraria v. Union of India & Ors.Delhi High Court 路 India 路 AI (implied, unspecified)
Nov 18, 2025
KMG Wires Private Limited v. The National Faceless Assessment Centre et al.High Court Bombay 路 India 路 AI (implied, unspecified)
Oct 6, 2025
Greenopolis Welfare Association (GWA) v. Narender Singh et al.Dehli High Court 路 India 路 Unidentified
Sep 25, 2025
Buckeye Trust v. PCITIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Bangalore 路 India 路 AI (implied, unspecified)
Dec 30, 2024
Open all matching records

Scope and limitation

This page groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish a judge鈥檚 general practices or sanction rate. For every entity type, the view is not a comparison against unobserved proceedings.

Indexing and evidence status

This public entity profile is indexable and meets the evidence-depth baseline of at least 3 source-linked records.