PC-59 Doe v Jewish Bd. of Family & Children's Servs., Inc.
Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0); document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.
SC New York · Oct 28, 2026
What happened in this matter?
False Quotes: Case Law | The papers attributed a quotation to Pelaez v. Seide that does not appear anywhere in that decision. Outcome: Monetary Sanction.
- Why the court cared
- The structured public record identifies fabricated quotes and misrepresented authority and records Monetary Sanction. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects fabricated quotes and misrepresented authority with Monetary Sanction in SC New York. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
False Quotes: Case Law | The papers attributed a quotation to Pelaez v. Seide that does not appear anywhere in that decision. Outcome: Monetary Sanction.
This matter connects fabricated quotes and misrepresented authority with Monetary Sanction in SC New York. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
What the record establishes about AI use
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
Monetary Sanction
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- False Quotes: Case Law | The papers attributed a quotation to Pelaez v. Seide that does not appear anywhere in that decision.
- Misrepresented: Exhibits & Submissions | Counsel acknowledged other factual misrepresentations in the submissions, but the decision does not specify their content.
- Misrepresented: Legal Norm | The papers asserted that Social Services Law § 413 does not create a private right of action, contrary to the statutory language and Appellate Division authority cited by the court.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Counsel misrepresented the holding of Pelaez v. Seide; the court identified the asserted treatment of the case as false.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in PC-59 Doe v Jewish Bd. of Family & Children's Servs., Inc.?
- False Quotes: Case Law | The papers attributed a quotation to Pelaez v. Seide that does not appear anywhere in that decision. Outcome: Monetary Sanction.
- Why does PC-59 Doe v Jewish Bd. of Family & Children's Servs., Inc. matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects fabricated quotes and misrepresented authority with Monetary Sanction in SC New York. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about PC-59 Doe v Jewish Bd. of Family & Children's Servs., Inc.?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this PC-59 Doe v Jewish Bd. of Family & Children's Servs., Inc. summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases
One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.