Resolución N.º 00499-2025, Expediente 17-000467-0455-PE
Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0); document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.
CA Cartago · Oct 16, 2025
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | The defense cited Sala Tercera vote No. 2018-0934 for alleged language concerning minors' cognitive and memory limitations. The appellate court stated that no such vote exists in that court and expressly identified the citation as nonexistent, suggesting AI-assisted drafting. Outcome: Bar Referral.
- Why the court cared
- The structured public record identifies fake citations and fabricated quotes and records Bar Referral. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Bar Referral in CA Cartago. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | The defense cited Sala Tercera vote No. 2018-0934 for alleged language concerning minors' cognitive and memory limitations. The appellate court stated that no such vote exists in that court and expressly identified the citation as nonexistent, suggesting AI-assisted drafting. Outcome: Bar Referral.
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Bar Referral in CA Cartago. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
What the record establishes about AI use
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Bar Referral
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
6 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | The defense cited Sala Tercera vote No. 2018-0934 for alleged language concerning minors' cognitive and memory limitations. The appellate court stated that no such vote exists in that court and expressly identified the citation as nonexistent, suggesting AI-assisted drafting.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | The defense attributed content concerning testimonial doubt and credibility standards to Sala Tercera vote No. 355 of April 29, 2025. The appellate court stated that the decision's content did not correspond to the transcription, although it related generally to the subject.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | The defense cited Sala Constitucional vote No. 1314-2020 but presented content that did not accurately reflect the precedent, according to the appellate court.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | The defense transcribed a purported quotation from Sala Constitucional vote No. 3842-94 in support of a due-process argument. The appellate court identified the quotation as inaccurate or unsupported by the cited decision.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | The defense cited Sala Tercera vote No. 1082 of September 24, 2021 for an alleged rule supporting acquittal. The appellate court stated that the decision's content did not match the quotation attributed to it.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | The defense relied on other purported jurisprudential quotations concerning apparent or insufficient reasoning and testimonial credibility. The appellate court stated generally that several cited decisions from Sala Tercera, Sala Constitucional, and other tribunals did not correspond to the propositions or wording quoted.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Resolución N.º 00499-2025, Expediente 17-000467-0455-PE?
- Fabricated: Case Law | The defense cited Sala Tercera vote No. 2018-0934 for alleged language concerning minors' cognitive and memory limitations. The appellate court stated that no such vote exists in that court and expressly identified the citation as nonexistent, suggesting AI-assisted drafting. Outcome: Bar Referral.
- Why does Resolución N.º 00499-2025, Expediente 17-000467-0455-PE matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Bar Referral in CA Cartago. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Resolución N.º 00499-2025, Expediente 17-000467-0455-PE?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Resolución N.º 00499-2025, Expediente 17-000467-0455-PE summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.
Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases
One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.