Resolución Nº 00592-2025, Expediente 24-000239-0456-PE
Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0), which credits Edward Cortes García; document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.
CA Cartago · Dec 5, 2025
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | The defense relied on a nonexistent Sala Tercera decision to support the claim that the testimony of the third party should have been credited. Outcome: Warning.
- Why the court cared
- The structured public record identifies fake citations and fabricated quotes and records Warning. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Warning in CA Cartago. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | The defense relied on a nonexistent Sala Tercera decision to support the claim that the testimony of the third party should have been credited. Outcome: Warning.
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Warning in CA Cartago. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
What the record establishes about AI use
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Warning
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
10 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | The defense relied on a nonexistent Sala Tercera decision to support the claim that the testimony of the third party should have been credited.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | The quotation attributed to this Sala Tercera decision did not correspond to the decision cited by counsel.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | The defense reproduced a quotation that did not correspond to the cited Sala Tercera decision concerning assessment of credibility and reasonable doubt.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | The quotation relied on to challenge the rejection of defense evidence did not correspond to the cited Constitutional Chamber decision.
- Fabricated: Case Law | The defense cited a nonexistent Constitutional Chamber decision in support of its argument concerning the duty to give reasons for rejecting evidence.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | The quotation attributed to this Sala Tercera decision did not relate to the cited decision.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | The defense transcribed an extract attributed to this Sala Tercera decision, but the court found that the decision did not concern the issue of reasonable doubt in favor of the accused as represented.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | The defense transcribed an extract attributed to this Constitutional Chamber decision, but the court found that it did not correspond to a decision resolving the cited reasonable-doubt issue.
Show 2 additional discrepancies
- Fabricated: Case Law | The defense cited a nonexistent Sala Tercera decision in support of the alleged lack of reasoning concerning the confiscated money.
- Fabricated: Case Law | The fourth appeal ground contained extensive unattributed passages presented as Sala Tercera jurisprudence without identifiable case references or contextual support; the court rejected the argument as deficient and unverifiable.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Resolución Nº 00592-2025, Expediente 24-000239-0456-PE?
- Fabricated: Case Law | The defense relied on a nonexistent Sala Tercera decision to support the claim that the testimony of the third party should have been credited. Outcome: Warning.
- Why does Resolución Nº 00592-2025, Expediente 24-000239-0456-PE matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Warning in CA Cartago. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Resolución Nº 00592-2025, Expediente 24-000239-0456-PE?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Resolución Nº 00592-2025, Expediente 24-000239-0456-PE summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.
Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases
One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.