Which source supports this Rodnei Chagas v. Fabricio Petinelli Vieira Coutinho summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

HomeCasesRodnei Chagas v. Fabricio Petinelli Vieira Coutinho

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.

Corpus matter record

Rodnei Chagas v. Fabricio Petinelli Vieira Coutinho

TJ Parana · Jun 6, 2025

Brazil Editorial impact: medium fake citations misrepresented authority landlord tenant trial Monetary

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant submitted multiple jurisprudential citations that could not be located and were deemed non-existent; court concluded they were created by an AI search tool. Outcome: Monetary Fine.

Why the court cared: The structured public record identifies fake citations and misrepresented authority and records Monetary Fine. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now: This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority with Monetary Fine in TJ Parana. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority with Monetary Fine in TJ Parana. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

CourtTJ Parana

Jurisdictioninternational

CircuitNot recorded

DateJun 6, 2025

AI toolUnidentified

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeMonetary Fine

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Monetary Fine

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant submitted multiple jurisprudential citations that could not be located and were deemed non-existent; court concluded they were created by an AI search tool.
Misrepresented: Case Law | A cited REsp number was real but concerned a totally different matter, so the citation's ratio decidendi did not match the appellant's argument—court treated this as misrepresentation likely from AI.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Rodnei Chagas v. Fabricio Petinelli Vieira Coutinho?: Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant submitted multiple jurisprudential citations that could not be located and were deemed non-existent; court concluded they were created by an AI search tool. Outcome: Monetary Fine.
Why does Rodnei Chagas v. Fabricio Petinelli Vieira Coutinho matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority with Monetary Fine in TJ Parana. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Rodnei Chagas v. Fabricio Petinelli Vieira Coutinho?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Rodnei Chagas v. Fabricio Petinelli Vieira Coutinho summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Ederaldo Cirino da Luz v. Joaquim Cirino da Luz et al.TJ Parana · Jun 23, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Manoel Tomaz Budal Filho v. Antonio Carlos Alves LopesTJ Parana · May 25, 2026same court · fake citations + landlord tenant Mercado E Açougue Sao Lucas Eireli v Pluxee Beneficios BrasilTJ Parana · May 15, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Nº 0104033-49.2025.8.16.0000TJ Parana · Apr 8, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Franciely da Silva LuzTJ Parana · Jun 9, 2026same court · fake citations + trial Nº 0006113-73.2025.8.16.0033TJ Parana · Sep 26, 2025same court · fake citations + trial

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source Suggest a correction to this record

Public-record statuspublic record, not an allegation-only entry

Indexing eligibilitypublicly indexable with evidence status disclosed

Published and maintained byManu Ayala · AI VortexIndependent legal AI risk intelligence

Corpus snapshot checked Aug 17, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Aug 17, 2026; latest tracked decision Aug 13, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Open TJ Parana profile Explore jurisdiction

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology