Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Segui v. Moniz
D. Arizona · Mar 24, 2026
AZ / federalEditorial impact: mediumfake citationscivil rightstrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs' counsel cited a nonexistent Arizona appellate decision 'Barker v. Brown & Brown, 210 Ariz. 321, 110 P.3d 1011 (Ct. App. 2005)'; the Court found the citation fabricated, noted the legal proposition was incorrect, and ordered counsel to show cause under Rule 11. Outcome: Order to Show Cause.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Order to Show Cause; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- A single fabricated state-court cite triggers Rule 11 show-cause — verify every cite against the official reporter before filing.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs' counsel cited a nonexistent Arizona appellate decision 'Barker v. Brown & Brown, 210 Ariz. 321, 110 P.3d 1011 (Ct. App. 2005)'; the Court found the citation fabricated, noted the legal proposition was incorrect, and ordered counsel to show cause under Rule 11. Outcome: Order to Show Cause.
Operational lesson
A single fabricated state-court cite triggers Rule 11 show-cause — verify every cite against the official reporter before filing.
Record details
ArizonaSingle-state evidence scope
CourtD. Arizona
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit9th Circuit
DateMar 24, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeOrder to Show Cause
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Order to Show Cause
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs' counsel cited a nonexistent Arizona appellate decision 'Barker v. Brown & Brown, 210 Ariz. 321, 110 P.3d 1011 (Ct. App. 2005)'; the Court found the citation fabricated, noted the legal proposition was incorrect, and ordered counsel to show cause under Rule 11.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Segui v. Moniz?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs' counsel cited a nonexistent Arizona appellate decision 'Barker v. Brown & Brown, 210 Ariz. 321, 110 P.3d 1011 (Ct. App. 2005)'; the Court found the citation fabricated, noted the legal proposition was incorrect, and ordered counsel to show cause under Rule 11. Outcome: Order to Show Cause.
- Why does Segui v. Moniz matter for legal AI risk?
- A single fabricated state-court cite triggers Rule 11 show-cause — verify every cite against the official reporter before filing.
- What does the public record establish about Segui v. Moniz?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Segui v. Moniz summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.