HomeCasesState National Insurance Company, Inc. v. Damon Treadwell, et al.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 95/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

State National Insurance Company, Inc. v. Damon Treadwell, et al.

N.D. Alabama · Mar 26, 2026

AL / federalEditorial impact: highfake citationsfabricated quotescontracttrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Filing attributed a quoted passage to Nishimatsu Construction Co. v. Houston National Bank; the court searched the opinion and other sources and found the quotation does not exist; attorney admitted AI use and lack of diligence. Outcome: Public reprimand; Order Notification.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Public reprimand; Order Notification; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: A public reprimand follows ChatGPT fabrications even when admitted — ban consumer tools and require source-pull verification.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

A public reprimand follows ChatGPT fabrications even when admitted — ban consumer tools and require source-pull verification.

Record details

AlabamaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtN.D. Alabama

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit11th Circuit

DateMar 26, 2026

AI toolChatGPT; OpenCase

Party typeLawyer

OutcomePublic reprimand; Order Notification

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionYes

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

ChatGPT; OpenCase is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Public reprimand; Order Notification

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Filing attributed a quoted passage to Nishimatsu Construction Co. v. Houston National Bank; the court searched the opinion and other sources and found the quotation does not exist; attorney admitted AI use and lack of diligence.
Fabricated: Case Law | Filing attributed a quoted sentence to Whelan v. Abell; the court found no such quotation in that opinion or elsewhere and concluded the sentence was fabricated by AI.

Questions this record answers

What happened in State National Insurance Company, Inc. v. Damon Treadwell, et al.?: Fabricated: Case Law | Filing attributed a quoted passage to Nishimatsu Construction Co. v. Houston National Bank; the court searched the opinion and other sources and found the quotation does not exist; attorney admitted AI use and lack of diligence. Outcome: Public reprimand; Order Notification.
Why does State National Insurance Company, Inc. v. Damon Treadwell, et al. matter for legal AI risk?: A public reprimand follows ChatGPT fabrications even when admitted — ban consumer tools and require source-pull verification.
What does the public record establish about State National Insurance Company, Inc. v. Damon Treadwell, et al.?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this State National Insurance Company, Inc. v. Damon Treadwell, et al. summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Chapel v. Americredit Financial Services & ExperianN.D. Alabama · May 21, 2026same court · fabricated quotes + contract Jackie L. Miller v. Regions BankN.D. Alabama · May 21, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Bridgett Watson Adams, et al. v. 3M CompanyN.D. Alabama · Apr 20, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Pleasant v. BurnsN.D. Alabama · Apr 8, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Joel A. Rivera v. Triad Properties Corporation, et al.N.D. Alabama · Mar 31, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Martin v. Redstone Federal Credit UnionN.D. Alabama · Sep 19, 2025same court · fake citations + contract

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

A public reprimand follows ChatGPT fabrications even when admitted — ban consumer tools and require source-pull verification.

Record details

AlabamaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtN.D. Alabama

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit11th Circuit

DateMar 26, 2026

AI toolChatGPT; OpenCase

Party typeLawyer

OutcomePublic reprimand; Order Notification

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionYes

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Filing attributed a quoted sentence to Whelan v. Abell; the court found no such quotation in that opinion or elsewhere and concluded the sentence was fabricated by AI.

Questions this record answers

What happened in State National Insurance Company, Inc. v. Damon Treadwell, et al.?

Why does State National Insurance Company, Inc. v. Damon Treadwell, et al. matter for legal AI risk?

A public reprimand follows ChatGPT fabrications even when admitted — ban consumer tools and require source-pull verification.

What does the public record establish about State National Insurance Company, Inc. v. Damon Treadwell, et al.?

Which source supports this State National Insurance Company, Inc. v. Damon Treadwell, et al. summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.