AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
AI visibilityConsultingSearch free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Nov 3, 2026 · Latest decision Oct 29, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesW.P.(C) 6049/2026 & W.P.(C) 6051/2026
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

W.P.(C) 6049/2026 & W.P.(C) 6051/2026

Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0), which credits Alvin Antony; document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.

Cite this record

High Court of Delhi · Jul 17, 2026

IndiaEditorial impact: lowfake citationstrialNone Adjudicated
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Citation relied upon in para.6 of impugned order; court's researchers could not locate this judgment in law reports. Outcome: Impugned order set aside and matter remanded for fresh decision.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies fake citations and trial and records Impugned order set aside and matter remanded for fresh decision. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects fake citations and trial with Impugned order set aside and matter remanded for fresh decision in High Court of Delhi. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Citation relied upon in para.6 of impugned order; court's researchers could not locate this judgment in law reports. Outcome: Impugned order set aside and matter remanded for fresh decision.

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and trial with Impugned order set aside and matter remanded for fresh decision in High Court of Delhi. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

CourtHigh Court of Delhi
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateJul 17, 2026
AI toolNo tool named in source
Party typeJudge
OutcomeImpugned order set aside and matter remanded for fresh decision
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Impugned order set aside and matter remanded for fresh decision

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

6 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | Citation relied upon in para.6 of impugned order; court's researchers could not locate this judgment in law reports.
  2. Fabricated: Case Law | Citation relied upon in para.6 of impugned order; court's researchers could not locate this judgment in law reports.
  3. Fabricated: Case Law | Citation relied upon in para.6 of impugned order; court's researchers could not locate this judgment in law reports.
  4. Fabricated: Case Law | Citation relied upon in para.6 of impugned order; court's researchers could not locate this judgment in law reports.
  5. Fabricated: Case Law | Citation relied upon in para.6 of impugned order; court's researchers could not locate this judgment in law reports.
  6. Fabricated: Case Law | Citation relied upon in para.6 of impugned order; court's researchers could not locate this judgment in law reports.

Questions this record answers

What happened in W.P.(C) 6049/2026 & W.P.(C) 6051/2026?
Fabricated: Case Law | Citation relied upon in para.6 of impugned order; court's researchers could not locate this judgment in law reports. Outcome: Impugned order set aside and matter remanded for fresh decision.
Why does W.P.(C) 6049/2026 & W.P.(C) 6051/2026 matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects fake citations and trial with Impugned order set aside and matter remanded for fresh decision in High Court of Delhi. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about W.P.(C) 6049/2026 & W.P.(C) 6051/2026?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this W.P.(C) 6049/2026 & W.P.(C) 6051/2026 summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Clifford v. Neidle et al.D. Wyoming · Oct 28, 2026fake citations + trial · same recorded tool: No tool named in sourcePaananen v. Peckham, Inc.W.D. Michigan · Oct 23, 2026fake citations + trial · same recorded tool: No tool named in sourceMoore v. Jackson Walker LLP, et al.S.D. Texas · Oct 21, 2026fake citations + trial · same recorded tool: No tool named in sourceWeyland v. Second Judicial District Court, et al.D. Nevada · Oct 20, 2026fake citations + trial · same recorded tool: No tool named in sourceCommonwealth v. ButlerSC Pennsylvania · Oct 19, 2026fake citations + trial · same recorded tool: No tool named in sourceHadarou Sare v. Central Collection Unit, et al.AC Maryland · Oct 16, 2026fake citations + trial · same recorded tool: No tool named in source
Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Before the next filing goes out, review the workflow behind it.

These records show where AI-assisted filings went wrong. AI Vortex works with law firms and legal teams on one AI-assisted workflow at a time: who reviews the output, who signs, and what source trail it leaves. Operations design, not legal advice.

Review a workflow