HomeCasesWCAT Decision A2501051 (Hilary Thomson)

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

WCAT Decision A2501051 (Hilary Thomson)

BC Workers' Compensation Appeal Tribunal · Aug 18, 2025

CanadaEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsmisrepresented authorityadministrative

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Outdated Advice: Repealed Law | Cited Policy D3-115-1 as recognizing late prohibited action complaints; tribunal found D3-115-1 is not a current Prevention Manual policy and does not support the asserted proposition.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is the response recorded in the linked source; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: BC WCAT caught citation-format drift plus fabricated cases; check both the format and the existence of cited tribunal decisions.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

BC WCAT caught citation-format drift plus fabricated cases; check both the format and the existence of cited tribunal decisions.

Record details

CourtBC Workers' Compensation Appeal Tribunal

Jurisdictioninternational

CircuitNot recorded

DateAug 18, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeSee source

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Outdated Advice: Repealed Law | Cited Policy D3-115-1 as recognizing late prohibited action complaints; tribunal found D3-115-1 is not a current Prevention Manual policy and does not support the asserted proposition.
Fabricated: Case Law | Provided a 2019-format citation that, when searched in WCAT's current A- format, corresponded to an unrelated appeal (the cited case did not support the worker's point).
Fabricated: Case Law | Included at least one case citation that appears not to exist and was likely fabricated by AI.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Cited WCAT decisions purportedly supporting late filings; first cited decision had nothing to do with late filings or the topic for which it was cited.

Questions this record answers

What happened in WCAT Decision A2501051 (Hilary Thomson)?: Outdated Advice: Repealed Law | Cited Policy D3-115-1 as recognizing late prohibited action complaints; tribunal found D3-115-1 is not a current Prevention Manual policy and does not support the asserted proposition.
Why does WCAT Decision A2501051 (Hilary Thomson) matter for legal AI risk?: BC WCAT caught citation-format drift plus fabricated cases; check both the format and the existence of cited tribunal decisions.
What does the public record establish about WCAT Decision A2501051 (Hilary Thomson)?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this WCAT Decision A2501051 (Hilary Thomson) summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

14095863 Canada Inc v Moosehead Breweries LimitedTrademarks Opposition Board · Jul 3, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Chilly Moose Ltd. v Moosehead Breweries LimitedTrademarks Opposition Board · Jun 29, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Moosehead Breweries Limited v 14095863 Canada Inc.Trademarks Opposition Board · Jun 29, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)M. D... A. c. Département de l'IsèreTA Grenoble · Jun 4, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)QQQJ and National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIS)Administrative Review Tribunal · May 22, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Ontario Securities Commission v AlliCapital Markets Tribunal · May 20, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

BC WCAT caught citation-format drift plus fabricated cases; check both the format and the existence of cited tribunal decisions.

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Provided a 2019-format citation that, when searched in WCAT's current A- format, corresponded to an unrelated appeal (the cited case did not support the worker's point).

Fabricated: Case Law | Included at least one case citation that appears not to exist and was likely fabricated by AI.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Cited WCAT decisions purportedly supporting late filings; first cited decision had nothing to do with late filings or the topic for which it was cited.

Questions this record answers

What happened in WCAT Decision A2501051 (Hilary Thomson)?

Why does WCAT Decision A2501051 (Hilary Thomson) matter for legal AI risk?

BC WCAT caught citation-format drift plus fabricated cases; check both the format and the existence of cited tribunal decisions.

What does the public record establish about WCAT Decision A2501051 (Hilary Thomson)?

Which source supports this WCAT Decision A2501051 (Hilary Thomson) summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.