Public trackerCorpus refreshed Nov 3, 2026 · Latest decision Oct 29, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Home/Cases
Complete corpus

Search legal AI risk records

Find cases, orders, courts, tools, and failure patterns. Results cover the complete global corpus; use status filters to separate allegation-only records. Judge search is available only where a judge is recorded.

Geographic scope: 2,257 public matters across the global corpus.Clear all filters

248 matching matters

Showing 26-50 · Page 2 of 10

Download these 248 results (CSV)

Public matterCourt / jurisdictionDateRecorded AI toolAmountImpact
TOV Realty, LLC v. Suarez; Kosel Equity, LLC v. MacGregorfake citations · other · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewSC ConnecticutCT · stateJul 31, 2026ChatGPT$2,000.00highMichael L. Ruiz v. Magellan Financial & Insurance Services (1)fake citations · fabricated quotes · employmentIncluded in the selected corpus viewD. ArizonaAZ · federalJul 28, 2026Claude AI—mediumScott v. Illinois Human Rights Comm’nfake citations · fabricated quotes · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewCA IllinoisIL · stateJul 28, 2026ChatGPT$15.0KhighJoann LeDoux v. Outliers, Inc. (1)fake citations · fabricated quotes · tortIncluded in the selected corpus viewW.D. WashingtonWA · federalJul 24, 2026ChatGPT, Claude$3.0KmediumAsif v Minister for Immigration and Citizenshippro se · fake citations · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewFedCFamAustralia · internationalJul 22, 2026ChatGPT—lowEmmanuel Tischler v Avada Traffic Pty Ltdpro se · misrepresented authority · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewFair Work CommissionAustralia · internationalJul 16, 2026Google AI—lowMinhye Park v. Hon. Barrington D. Parker, et al.fake citations · bar referral · civil rightsIncluded in the selected corpus viewS.D. New YorkNY · federalJul 15, 2026GPT-3.5—highIn re Rosslyn2016, LLC, et al.fake citations · fabricated quotes · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewS.D. Texas (Bankruptcy)TX · federalJul 14, 2026Westlaw Precision$29.9KhighThompson v. County of San Diegofabricated quotes · misrepresented authority · otherIncluded in the selected corpus viewCA California (4d)CA · stateJul 14, 2026Lexis+ with Protégé—lowKevin Leiske et al. v. Robert Gregory Kidd et al.fake citations · fabricated quotes · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewDelaware Ch.DE · stateJul 1, 2026Perplexity—mediumCrescendo Education v. KTC Human Resource ConsultantstrialIncluded in the selected corpus viewHigh Court MalayaMalaysia · internationalJun 26, 2026ChatGPT—lowDavid R. Pete v. Greg Abbott, et al.pro se · fake citations · civil rightsIncluded in the selected corpus viewE.D. TexasTX · federalJun 15, 2026Cetient$200mediumMazaheri v Law Society of Ontariofake citations · misrepresented authority · administrativeIncluded in the selected corpus viewLaw Society Tribunal (ON)Canada · internationalJun 12, 2026Grok—highWCAT Decision A2501416pro se · fake citations · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewBritish Columbia WCATCanada · internationalJun 11, 2026Google AI—lowTlingit Haida Tribal Business Corporation v. OnePromomfabricated quotes · contract · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewD. ColoradoCO · federalJun 9, 2026Eve Legal—mediumWithers v. City of Aberdeenfake citations · fabricated quotes · bar referralIncluded in the selected corpus viewN.D. MississippiMS · federalJun 8, 2026First Drafts$8.0Kcareer endingFadi El Bitar v. Julio Hernandezfabricated quotes · immigration · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewW.D. WashingtonWA · federalJun 2, 2026Google Gemini$1.0KmediumHeriberto Perez-Castillo v. Todd W. Blanchefake citations · fabricated quotes · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus view7th Cir. CAUnited States · federalJun 1, 2026ChatGPT$5.0KhighRichard A. Cole v. Midland States Bank, et al.pro se · misrepresented authority · contractIncluded in the selected corpus viewD. MassachusettsMA · federalJun 1, 2026Google AI Overview—lowState of Oklahoma ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. Reevesfake citations · misrepresented authority · civil rightsIncluded in the selected corpus viewSC OklahomaOK · stateMay 27, 2026ChatGPT—highGuo v. Meade Motorcars, L.L.C.pro se · fake citations · fabricated quotesIncluded in the selected corpus viewCA Ohio (6d)OH · stateMay 26, 2026Deepseek$100mediumJackie L. Miller v. Regions Bankfabricated quotes · bar referral · employmentIncluded in the selected corpus viewN.D. AlabamaAL · federalMay 21, 2026ChatGPT—highThat Xiong v. Minga Wofford (2)fake citations · habeas · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewE.D. CaliforniaCA · federalMay 21, 2026ChatGPT—lowDavis v. Marion County Juvenile Detention Centerfake citations · fabricated quotes · civil rightsIncluded in the selected corpus viewS.D. IndianaIN · federalMay 20, 2026Fastcase$2.0KmediumChakma v. Sushi Katsuei, Inc.fake citations · misrepresented authority · employmentIncluded in the selected corpus viewS.D. New YorkNY · federalMay 19, 2026LexisNexis AI$2.7Kmedium
Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Data cut: corpus refreshed Nov 3, 2026, 2,257 public records.

Cite this page

Bluebook

AI Vortex, Search AI hallucination cases, Legal AI Risk Tracker (updated Nov. 3, 2026), https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/cases (last visited Nov. 3, 2026).

APA

AI Vortex. (2026, November 3). Search AI hallucination cases. Legal AI Risk Tracker. Retrieved November 3, 2026, from https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/cases

URL

https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/cases (accessed 2026-11-03)

Cites the AI Vortex page, not the underlying decision; cite the court's own document for the holding.

Before the next filing goes out, review the workflow behind it.

These records show where AI-assisted filings went wrong. AI Vortex works with law firms and legal teams on one AI-assisted workflow at a time: who reviews the output, who signs, and what source trail it leaves. Operations design, not legal advice.

Review a workflow