Home/Cases

Complete corpus

Search legal AI risk records

Find cases, orders, courts, tools, and failure patterns. Results cover the complete global corpus; use status filters to separate allegation-only records. Judge search is available only where a judge is recorded.

Browse courts Browse judges Open map

Search

Country

US state

Editorial impact

Court

Judge / decision-maker

AI tool

Failure mode

Record status

Geographic scope: 2,257 public matters across the global corpus.Clear all filters

Attribution: named tool recorded

Public matterCourt / jurisdictionDateRecorded AI toolAmount Impact

Farhat v. Cutera, Inc.other · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewN.D. CaliforniaCA · federalOct 28, 2026Legora—low United States of America et al. v. Los Angeles Film School LLC et al.fake citations · misrepresented authority · bar referralIncluded in the selected corpus viewC.D. CaliforniaCA · federalOct 23, 2026ChatGPT$5.0Khigh Mercante v. Tarziafake citations · fabricated quotes · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewE.D. New YorkNY · federalOct 2, 2026Westlaw AI—low Tijerino v. Spotify USA Inc.pro se · fake citations · ipIncluded in the selected corpus viewS.D. New YorkNY · federalSep 29, 2026Lex—low Lawand Hill v. Foundation Media LLCip · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewS.D. New YorkNY · federalSep 22, 2026Harvey—low NK (Namibia) v Secretary of State for the Home Departmentfake citations · fabricated quotes · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewUpper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)Namibia; UK · internationalSep 21, 2026ChatGPT—low Bell v. City of Clairton et al.fake citations · misrepresented authority · employmentIncluded in the selected corpus viewW.D. PennsylvaniaPA · federalSep 15, 2026Lexis AI—low Tiekert v. Village of Mamaroneck, et al.fabricated quotes · misrepresented authority · civil rightsIncluded in the selected corpus viewS.D. New YorkNY · federalSep 14, 2026ChatGPT$500medium Beus Gilbert PLLC v. Brigham Young University et al.fake citations · misrepresented authority · otherIncluded in the selected corpus viewD. UtahUT · federalSep 9, 2026Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini$3.0Kmedium State v. Sandoval / In re Stephen D. Aaronsfake citations · misrepresented authority · bar referralIncluded in the selected corpus viewSC New MexicoNM · stateSep 9, 2026ChatGPT$5.0Kcareer ending Youssian v Village of Kings Pointfabricated quotes · misrepresented authority · administrativeIncluded in the selected corpus viewSC New YorkNY · stateSep 9, 2026Spellbook AI$15.0Khigh Douglas v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Companyfake citations · bar referral · otherIncluded in the selected corpus viewD.C. Court of AppealsUnited States · federalSep 3, 2026Google AI—high Michael L. Ruiz v. Magellan Financial & Insurance Services (2)fabricated quotes · misrepresented authority · otherIncluded in the selected corpus viewD. ArizonaAZ · federalAug 24, 2026ChatGPT—high Unspecified murder appeal (Las Cruces area)fake citations · fabricated quotes · bar referralIncluded in the selected corpus viewNew Mexico SCNM · stateAug 21, 2026ChatGPT$5.0Khigh Disruptive Resources, LLC v. Ballistic Barrier Products Inc. et al.misrepresented authority · ip · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewD. DelawareDE · federalAug 20, 2026Strongsuit—low Imperial Reliance, LLC v. HZ Properties & Marketing, LLCfake citations · fabricated quotes · otherIncluded in the selected corpus viewN.D. TexasTX · federalAug 18, 2026Westlaw generative AI / premium Westlaw subscription—low Joann LeDoux v. Outliers, Inc. (2)fake citations · tort · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewW.D. WashingtonWA · federalAug 18, 2026Claude and ChatGPT—medium Brankle v. Schmellpro se · fake citations · tortIncluded in the selected corpus viewCA IndianaIN · stateAug 14, 2026ChatGPT$1.5Kmedium A. P. v. S. K.pro se · fake citations · fabricated quotesIncluded in the selected corpus viewCA QuébecCanada · internationalAug 11, 2026ChatGPT—medium Fa’alagilagi Meni-Siliga v. A’s Contractor, Inc., et al.fake citations · fabricated quotes · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewLos Angeles SC, CaliforniaCA · stateAug 11, 2026Irys—low Hack v. Preston et alpro se · misrepresented authority · otherIncluded in the selected corpus viewD. UtahUT · federalAug 7, 2026ChatGPT—low Southland Homes & Real Estate and Investment, LLC v. Lamfake citations · misrepresented authority · bar referralIncluded in the selected corpus viewSC CaliforniaCA · stateAug 5, 2026ChatGPT and Google Gemini$4.0Khigh Ulish Kerry Terrace Booker, III v. U.S. Bank National Associationpro se · fake citations · fabricated quotesIncluded in the selected corpus viewD. ConnecticutCT · federalAug 5, 2026Gemini Pro; Perplexity; Cetient Legal AI; ChatGPT—low Barteca Holdings v. Tacobarnfabricated quotes · misrepresented authority · bar referralIncluded in the selected corpus viewD. ConnecticutCT · federalAug 4, 2026Open Law; Claude; ChatGPT$3.5Khigh Kleyman Law Group, P.C. v. Kaloidisfake citations · fabricated quotes · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewSC New YorkNY · stateAug 4, 2026Claude and other generative AI platforms$46.5Khigh

Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Data cut: corpus refreshed Nov 3, 2026, 2,257 public records.

Cite this page

Bluebook: AI Vortex, Search AI hallucination cases, Legal AI Risk Tracker (updated Nov. 3, 2026), https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/cases (last visited Nov. 3, 2026).
APA: AI Vortex. (2026, November 3). Search AI hallucination cases. Legal AI Risk Tracker. Retrieved November 3, 2026, from https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/cases
URL: https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/cases (accessed 2026-11-03)

Cites the AI Vortex page, not the underlying decision; cite the court's own document for the holding.

Before the next filing goes out, review the workflow behind it.

These records show where AI-assisted filings went wrong. AI Vortex works with law firms and legal teams on one AI-assisted workflow at a time: who reviews the output, who signs, and what source trail it leaves. Operations design, not legal advice.

Review a workflow