Home/Cases

Complete corpus

Search legal AI risk records

Find cases, orders, courts, tools, and failure patterns. Results cover the complete global corpus; use status filters to separate allegation-only records. Judge search is available only where a judge is recorded.

Browse courts Browse judges Open map

Search

Country

US state

Editorial impact

Court

Judge / decision-maker

AI tool

Failure mode

Record status

Geographic scope: 2,215 public matters across the global corpus.Clear all filters

Public matterCourt / jurisdictionDateRecorded AI toolAmount Impact

RR v. Fraser Health Authority and others (No.3)pro se · fake citations · employmentRecorded response: none adjudicatedBritish Columbia HRTCanada · internationalNov 20, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—low Jorge Paredes Guevara v. A&P Restaurant Corp., et al.fake citations · fabricated quotes · misrepresented authorityRecorded response: none adjudicatedS.D. New YorkNY · federalNov 18, 2025No tool named in source—low Jeremie Montgomery v. AFL-CIOpro se · fake citations · employmentRecorded response: none adjudicatedM.D. TennesseeTN · federalNov 14, 2025No tool named in source—low Kuigoua v. Parkpro se · fake citations · misrepresented authorityRecorded response: none adjudicatedCA CaliforniaCA · stateNov 10, 2025Unidentified—low QTR v BXD ([2025] NZERA 716)pro se · fake citations · misrepresented authorityRecorded response: none adjudicatedEmployment Relations AuthorityNew Zealand · internationalNov 7, 2025ChatGPT—low BC Taco Restaurant Group Ltd.fake citations · employment · trialRecorded response: none adjudicatedBC Employment Standards TribunalCanada · internationalNov 6, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—low Jamison Warfield v. W.N. Morehouse Truck Line, Inc.fake citations · employment · trialRecorded response: none adjudicatedE.D. TennesseeTN · federalNov 6, 2025No tool named in source—low Clarke v State of Queensland (Department of Education)pro se · fake citations · fabricated quotesRecorded response: none adjudicatedQueensland IRCAustralia · internationalNov 5, 2025ChatGPT—low County of Los Angeles v. Neill Francis Niblettfake citations · misrepresented authority · employmentRecorded response: none adjudicatedCA CaliforniaCA · stateOct 31, 2025Unidentified—low Villasenor v. Ralphs Grocery Co.fake citations · employment · trialRecorded response: none adjudicatedCalifornia SCCA · stateOct 28, 2025Unidentified—low John Weaver v. Shasta Servicespro se · fake citations · employmentRecorded response: none adjudicatedW.D. PennsylvaniaPA · federalOct 22, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—low Visca v. Halton District School Boardpro se · fake citations · employmentRecorded response: none adjudicatedHRT OntarioCanada · internationalOct 9, 2025No tool named in source—low Vivek Singha v. Metal Manufacturespro se · fake citations · misrepresented authorityRecorded response: none adjudicatedFair Work CommissionAustralia · internationalOct 8, 2025Unidentified—low Delisle v. Canadian Association of Professional Employeespro se · fake citations · misrepresented authorityRecorded response: none adjudicatedFPSLREBCanada · internationalOct 3, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—low Fernando Oliveira v Ryanair DACpro se · fake citations · misrepresented authorityRecorded response: none adjudicatedWorkplace Relations CommissionIreland · internationalOct 1, 2025Unidentified—low Hogan v. Treasury Boardpro se · fake citations · fabricated quotesRecorded response: none adjudicatedFederal PSLREBCanada · internationalOct 1, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—low Kenisha Black v. Mississippi DRS & Howardfake citations · employment · trialRecorded response: none adjudicatedS.D. MississippiMS · federalSep 24, 2025Unidentified—low Salem v. Deputy Headpro se · fake citations · misrepresented authorityRecorded response: none adjudicatedFederal PSLREBCanada · internationalSep 24, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—low Hugo v Affinity Education Group Pty Ltdpro se · fake citations · employmentRecorded response: none adjudicatedFederal Circuit and Family Court of AustraliaAustralia · internationalSep 18, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—low Howe v. NSW Department of Educationpro se · fake citations · misrepresented authorityRecorded response: none adjudicatedNSW Industrial Relations CommissionAustralia · internationalSep 17, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—low Alana Kotler v Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federationpro se · fake citations · misrepresented authorityRecorded response: none adjudicatedOntario Labour Relations BoardCanada · internationalAug 29, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—low Thackston v. Driscollfake citations · fabricated quotes · misrepresented authorityRecorded response: none adjudicatedW.D. TexasTX · federalAug 28, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—low WCAT Decision A2501051 (Hilary Thomson)pro se · fake citations · misrepresented authorityRecorded response: none adjudicatedBC Workers' Compensation Appeal TribunalCanada · internationalAug 18, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—low Johnny McMurry, Jr. v. Neiders Company LLC, et al.pro se · fake citations · employmentRecorded response: none adjudicatedW.D. WashingtonWA · federalAug 14, 2025Unidentified—low WCAT Decision A2402099pro se · fake citations · administrativeRecorded response: none adjudicatedBC WCATCanada · internationalJul 30, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—low

Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.